CAM Workflow Prediction for CNC Machining Sequence Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) systems face inefficiencies in programming CNC machine tools due to the need for users to manually select from numerous permutations of machining types, tools, and parameters, leading to increased time, resource consumption, and user error, especially for users with varying skill levels and machining habits.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize machine learning and AI to predict and recommend optimized machining workflows by analyzing user habits, environment, and skill sets, selecting sequences of machining types, tools, and parameters based on historical data, aiming to reduce unnecessary movements and cycle time, and improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If users manually select machining types, tools, and parameters from numerous permutations, then customization and adaptability are improved, but time consumption and user error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated prediction of machining workflows, tool selections, and parameters without requiring manual user input for each decision. The AI model independently analyzes machining features and generates optimized sequences, eliminating the time-consuming manual selection process while maintaining adaptability through learning from historical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and learns from historical machining data to build predictive models before actual machining operations. By performing preliminary analysis and pattern recognition on past workflows, the system prepares optimized recommendations in advance, reducing real-time decision-making time while preserving customization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If users manually select machining types, tools, and parameters from numerous permutations, then customization and adaptability are improved, but user error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoiduser error
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The automated prediction system eliminates manual selection errors by having the AI model independently determine optimal machining parameters, tool selections, and sequences based on learned patterns from historical data, while still adapting to specific machining features and requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where machining results and historical data are continuously analyzed to refine predictive accuracy. By learning from past successes and errors, the system improves its recommendations over time, reducing user error while maintaining customization through adaptive learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automated prediction is implemented, then time efficiency and productivity are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical decision-making processes with an AI-based predictive model that automatically analyzes machining features and generates optimized workflows. This substitution increases productivity by eliminating manual intervention while managing complexity through software-based intelligence rather than physical system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The AI predictive model serves as an intermediary between machining requirements and execution parameters. It translates complex feature specifications into optimized machining sequences, tool selections, and parameters, increasing productivity while containing system complexity within the software layer rather than requiring complex hardware or manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of time

If automated prediction is implemented, then time efficiency is improved, but extent of automation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves high time efficiency by completely automating the prediction of machining workflows, tool selections, and parameters through AI algorithms that independently analyze features and generate optimized sequences without manual intervention, thereby increasing both time efficiency and automation extent simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis and prediction of optimal machining parameters before actual machining operations begin. By pre-computing optimized workflows through automated prediction, the system achieves time efficiency while managing automation complexity through advance preparation and pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11693394B2Systems and methods for automated prediction of machining workflow in computer aided manufacturing
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 HEXAGON INNOVATION HUB GMBH
  • US11693394B2 patent drawing
  • US11693394B2 patent drawing
  • US11693394B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods including selecting one or more sequences of machining types for a feature of one or more features, where the selection of the one or more sequences of machining types is based on the feature and a database of prior selections of machining types; selecting one or more tools for the selected one or more sequences of machining types, where the selection of the one or more tools is based on the feature, the selected one or more sequences of machining types, and a database of prior selections of one or more tools; and selecting one or more machining parameters for the selected one or more tools, where the selected machining parameters are based on the feature, the selected one or more sequences of machining types, the selected one or more tools, and a database of prior selections of one or more machining parameters.