CNN-Based Three-Dimensional Anatomical Image Analysis for Spinal Levels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current image analysis methods for spinal anatomy, such as X-ray and CT scans, lack autonomy and reliability, leading to subjective measurements, increased radiation exposure, and difficulty in comparing patient images over time, which complicates surgical planning and navigation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing machine learning models, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to process and analyze anatomical images, enabling objective identification of spinal levels and anatomical components, and generating visual representations for surgical guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional X-ray and CT imaging methods are used to acquire spinal anatomy information, then anatomical image data can be obtained, but patients are subjected to high levels of radiation exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage data qualityVSAvoidradiation exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses machine learning models to create a digital copy or representation of spinal anatomy from limited imaging data, allowing comprehensive analysis without requiring multiple high-radiation imaging sessions. The model learns from training data to generate accurate anatomical representations that reduce the need for repeated CT scans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of image analysis by using deep learning algorithms that can extract meaningful information from lower-quality or lower-dose images. The model transforms the relationship between radiation dose and image quality by enabling reliable analysis even when radiation exposure is minimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional X-ray analysis methods are used, then image interpretation can be performed, but the analysis is subjective and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement consistencyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements autonomous analysis where the machine learning model automatically performs spinal level identification and anatomical structure analysis without requiring manual measurement or interpretation. The model serves itself by learning from training data and applying that knowledge to new cases, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual analysis while ensuring consistent, objective results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual measurement and visual inspection with an automated computational system. Deep learning algorithms substitute for the human expert's manual analysis, providing rapid, consistent, and reproducible measurements without the subjectivity and time requirements of traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If manual measurement and analysis of X-rays are performed, then necessary measurements can be obtained, but the process is subject to user error and lacks autonomy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous analysis capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs autonomous analysis by automatically identifying spinal levels, vertebrae, and anatomical structures without human intervention. The system learns from labeled training data and independently applies this knowledge to new images, eliminating user error while maintaining high accuracy through continuous validation and refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the model's predictions are validated against ground truth data during training, and performance is continuously monitored and improved. This feedback loop ensures that autonomous analysis maintains high reliability by learning from errors and refining its measurements over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If traditional imaging analysis is used, then current patient images can be examined, but comparing images over time to track progress is difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelongitudinal comparison accuracyVSAvoidimage comparison system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates standardized digital representations of spinal anatomy at different time points using machine learning models. These consistent digital copies enable reliable comparison over time by eliminating variability in manual measurement techniques, allowing accurate tracking of spinal changes and treatment progress through longitudinal analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250232571A1Systems, devices, and methods for level identification of three-dimensional anatomical images
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 SURGALIGN SPINE TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250232571A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232571A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232571A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments include exemplary systems. methods. and computer-accessible medium for analysis of anatomical images and identification of anatomical components and/or structures. In some embodiments. systems. devices. and methods described herein relate to identification of levels of a spine and other anatomical components associated with those levels.