CVD Carbon Nanotube Reactor Layout for High-Purity Continuous Growth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing carbon nanotube production methods face challenges in achieving high yield, low residual catalyst content, and high crystallinity with a high aspect ratio, which affects their industrial applicability and performance.

Innovation Solution

A chemical vapor deposition apparatus with a horizontal reaction tube, adjustable nozzle insertion depth and distance, and a controlled reaction area, combined with a cooling and heating system, to optimize carbon nanotube synthesis conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional chemical vapor deposition is used, then carbon nanotubes can be synthesized, but the yield is low and residual catalyst content is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon nanotube yieldVSAvoidresidual catalyst content
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a localized reaction zone within the reaction tube where specific conditions (temperature, gas flow, catalyst concentration) are optimized to enhance carbon nanotube synthesis. The nozzle member positioned at a specific distance from the reaction area creates a focused reaction zone that improves yield while controlling catalyst distribution to minimize residual content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by adjusting multiple process parameters including reaction temperature, carbon source flow rate, catalyst concentration, and nozzle insertion depth. These parameter optimizations enable simultaneous improvement of carbon nanotube yield and reduction of residual catalyst content through controlled variation of synthesis conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional synthesis methods are used, then carbon nanotubes can be produced, but crystallinity and aspect ratio are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecrystallinityVSAvoidaspect ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-positioning the nozzle member at an optimized distance from the reaction area before synthesis begins. This preliminary arrangement ensures that carbon sources are delivered to the reaction zone under optimal conditions, resulting in carbon nanotubes with high crystallinity and high aspect ratio from the outset.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuity of useful action through sustained reaction conditions maintained throughout the synthesis process. The continuous supply of carbon source and catalyst through the nozzle member, combined with maintained temperature and gas flow, ensures uninterrupted formation of high-quality carbon nanotubes with consistent crystallinity and aspect ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Quantity of substance

If post-treatment for catalyst removal is applied, then residual catalyst content decreases, but process complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual catalyst contentVSAvoidpost-treatment process
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the taking out principle by extracting and removing the catalyst from the reaction system before carbon nanotube formation. The catalyst is introduced in a controlled manner through the nozzle member and is designed to be selectively removed or deactivated, eliminating the need for complex post-treatment processes while achieving low residual catalyst content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by designing a system where the catalyst serves its primary function during synthesis and then automatically becomes inactive or removable without requiring external intervention. The controlled catalyst delivery and reaction conditions enable the system to self-regulate catalyst presence, achieving low residual content without additional processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If nozzle insertion depth is increased, then carbon source delivery is improved, but distance from reaction area decreases affecting synthesis quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon source delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsynthesis quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by optimizing the nozzle insertion depth as a variable parameter that balances carbon source delivery efficiency with distance from the reaction area. The specific insertion depth (30-80mm) is determined through dynamic consideration of reaction zone location, ensuring both effective carbon delivery and appropriate distance for high-quality synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by adjusting the nozzle insertion depth within a specific range (30-80mm) to optimize the balance between carbon source delivery and reaction area proximity. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient carbon supply while maintaining the geometric conditions necessary for high-quality carbon nanotube synthesis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The apparatus enables high-yield production of carbon nanotubes with a residual catalyst content less than 10 wt%, a Raman peak intensity ratio (I G /I D ) of 50 or more, and an aspect ratio of 17,000 or more, resulting in improved purity and mechanical strength.

Implementation Method 1

a heating member provided in the plurality of spaces and configured to heat the reaction tube to form a reaction area within the reaction tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

The chemical vapor deposition process is a method of growing carbon nanotubes by reacting a reaction gas (carbon-containing gas) with an introduced catalyst in a high-temperature reaction tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical vapor deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentEP3838842B1Apparatus for continuously producing carbon nanotubes and method for using it
Publication Date: 2026.04.22 KOREA INST OF SCI & TECH
  • EP3838842B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3838842B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4A
  • EP3838842B1 patent drawingFigure 4B~5A

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an apparatus capable of continuously producing carbon nanotubes having high crystallinity, a low residual catalyst content and a high aspect ratio. The apparatus for producing carbon nanotubes includes: a reaction unit configured to synthesize carbon nanotubes (CNTs); a supply unit configured to supply a carbon source to the reaction unit through a supply pipe; and a collection unit configured to collect carbon nanotubes discharged from the reaction unit, wherein the reaction unit may include a chemical vapor deposition reactor.