Sparse Whole Genome Sequencing CNV Profile Adjustment for Tumor Contamination
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for determining copy number variation (CNV) profiles in tumor cells are complicated by tumor cell contamination, requiring accurate adjustment to achieve reliable results, and existing technologies lack cost-effective and efficient solutions for characterizing CNV profiles using sparse whole genome sequencing.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that utilize sparse genome data to generate an unadjusted CNV profile, normalize it, and adjust for ploidy and contamination rates to select the best fit CNV profile, generating an adjusted report that accounts for contamination without needing control samples, leveraging sparse whole genome sequencing for cost-effectiveness and sensitivity.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of time
If sparse whole genome sequencing is used to determine CNV profiles, then cost and time are reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate due to tumor cell contamination and mixed cell populations
Solution Approach 1:
The method extracts and separates the tumor cell CNV signal from the mixed cell population by deconvoluting the sequencing data to identify and remove contributions from non-tumor cells, stromal cells, and other contaminants, isolating the pure tumor CNV profile for accurate analysis
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements iterative refinement where initial CNV calls are used to estimate tumor purity and contamination levels, which then feed back into adjusted segmentation and purity correction algorithms to refine the CNV profile, repeating the process until convergence to achieve accurate results from sparse data
2Measurement precision
If traditional CNV determination methods are used with control samples, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity and ease of operation worsen due to requiring matched normal samples and complex deconvolution
Solution Approach 1:
The method enables the tumor sample itself to serve as its own control by using the CNV profile data within the sample to estimate tumor purity and contamination levels, eliminating the need for separate matched normal samples or external control materials while maintaining accurate CNV detection
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs multiple functions using the same sparse sequencing data: it simultaneously determines CNV profiles, estimates tumor purity, corrects for contamination, and identifies actionable mutations without requiring separate assays or control samples, simplifying the overall workflow while maintaining precision
3Measurement precision
If adjusted segmentation and purity correction are applied, then CNV profile accuracy improves, but loss of information increases due to multiple transformation steps
Solution Approach 1:
The method performs preliminary normalization of the sparse sequencing data to a standard reference genome before applying segmentation and purity correction, preserving the original signal characteristics and enabling reversible transformations that minimize information loss throughout the analysis pipeline
Data Source
AI summary
A method (100) for determining a copy number variation (CNV) profile, comprising: (i) receiving (110) sparse genome sequencing data; (ii) determining (120) an unadjusted CNV profile; (iii) normalizing (130) the unadjusted CNV profile; (iv) receiving (140) a range for possible ploidy and for a possible contamination rate; (v) determining (150) adjusted segmentation values for the CNV profile; (vi) determining (160) a plurality of adjustment scores comprising a distance between an adjusted segmentation value and a closest whole integer for a CNV call; (vii) comparing (170) the determined plurality of adjustment scores to one or more predetermined factors for selecting a CNV profile best fit; (viii) selecting (180) one of the plurality of adjustment scores as a best fit for the copy number variation profile of the tumor cells of the tumor; (ix) generating (190) an adjusted CNV profile report; and (x) reporting (192) the generated adjusted CNV profile report.


