Co-location Security System for User Verification
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional methods for identifying entities in interactions are often inaccurate, costly, and susceptible to misappropriation, lacking effective verification mechanisms, especially in card-not-present interactions where physical accessories cannot be used.
Innovation Solution
A co-location security system that verifies user identity by combining location determination components of user computer systems and resource accessories using GPS, WiFi triangulation, near-field communication, or geo-fencing, setting time and geo-location requirements for verification, and requiring user actions with the resource accessory before allowing interactions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If traditional entity identification methods are used, then the identification process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of entity identification deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple identification factors (location data from GPS/WiFi triangulation, device identifiers, transaction context) into a unified verification system. The co-location verification merges the spatial information from the resource accessory with the user's computer system location to create a multi-dimensional identification approach that enhances accuracy while managing complexity through integrated processing.
Solution Approach 2:
The verification system is designed to handle multiple types of interactions and resource accessories through a universal co-location verification framework. The system can verify both physical card-present and card-not-present interactions using the same fundamental approach of comparing resource accessory location with user location, making the system adaptable across different transaction types without requiring separate verification mechanisms.
2Reliability
If traditional entity identification methods are used, then the system is easy to operate, but the system becomes susceptible to misappropriation
Solution Approach 1:
The resource accessory performs self-verification by automatically providing its location information and comparing it with the user's computer system location. The system autonomously determines whether the interaction is authorized based on co-location verification, eliminating the need for manual verification steps and maintaining ease of operation while significantly enhancing security against misappropriation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system continuously monitors and compares location data from the resource accessory with the user's computer system location in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to dynamically verify authorization status and detect potential misappropriation attempts, enhancing security while maintaining a seamless user experience through automated decision-making.
3Measurement precision
If location verification is performed for every interaction, then verification accuracy is maintained, but processing time and system overhead increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs location verification in advance by continuously monitoring the co-location status before interactions occur. By pre-establishing the verification state and maintaining readiness to authenticate, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming verification processing during actual interactions, thus maintaining accuracy while reducing processing time overhead.
Solution Approach 2:
The verification system operates periodically by checking co-location status at scheduled intervals rather than continuously for every single interaction. This periodic verification approach maintains location accuracy while significantly reducing the computational overhead and processing time required, allowing the system to balance security with efficiency.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enhances interaction security by accurately identifying user locations and reducing misappropriation through multi-factor verification, ensuring secure transactions even in card-not-present scenarios.
Implementation Method 1
identifying a user computer system location, and a resource accessory location of a resource accessory of the user... The resource accessory location may be determined in a number of different ways, including, but not limited to, a location determination component of the resource accessory
Implementation Method 2
utilizes co-location in order to more accurately identify a user location... based a location determination component for the user computer systems
Implementation Method 3
The system identifies a user computer system location based a location determination component for the user computer systems... The resource accessory location may be determined in a number of different ways, including, but not limited to, a location determination component of the resource accessory
Data Source
AI summary
An interaction security system for user verification utilizes co-location in order to more accurately identify a user location. The system identifies a user computer system location based a location determination component for the user computer systems. Moreover, the system identifies a resource accessory location of a resource accessory. The resource accessory location may be determined in a number of different ways, including, but not limited to, a location determination component of the resource accessory. The system may utilize a time requirement and/or a geo-location requirement in order to maintain verification of the user for a period of time and/or within a specific location. Moreover, the system may require the user to take an action with respect to the resource accessory before verifying the user location for an interaction.