Co-Manipulation Robot Arm With Optical Sensing for Laparoscopic Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laparoscopic surgical procedures require significant manual interaction and use of complex, expensive robot-assisted systems that limit workflow flexibility and require unique instruments, making it difficult for surgeons to seamlessly position and manipulate surgical instruments.

Innovation Solution

A co-manipulation surgical system with a robot arm that automatically switches between passive, co-manipulation, and haptic modes based on user input, using a controller to manage impedance and position surgical instruments, and incorporates optical scanners for depth data and collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If complex robot-assisted systems are used to enhance laparoscopic surgical procedures, then surgical precision and control are improved, but system cost, footprint, and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into separate functional modules: a mobile robotic platform for instrument manipulation, a stationary optical scanner for depth mapping, and a control system for coordinating their operations. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while reducing overall system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arm is designed to accommodate multiple surgical instruments including graspers, scissors, and retractors through a universal coupling mechanism. The system can perform both automated instrument manipulation and collaborative manipulation with the surgeon, providing multi-functional capability without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If traditional manual manipulation methods are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but workflow efficiency and surgical precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidworkflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm autonomously performs instrument manipulation tasks including positioning, grasping, and manipulating surgical tools based on pre-planned trajectories and real-time optical feedback. The system self-corrects its position using depth data from the optical scanner, reducing the need for constant manual intervention while maintaining high workflow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The optical scanner continuously captures depth data of the surgical site and feeds this information back to the control system, which adjusts the robotic arm's movements in real-time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables precise instrument manipulation while maintaining system simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If rail-mounted orthopedic retractors are used to hold instruments in position, then instrument stability is improved, but manual interaction requirements and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument stabilityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm provides dynamic instrument positioning and stabilization, adjusting its grip and position in real-time based on surgical needs and optical feedback. Unlike static rail-mounted systems, the robotic arm can actively compensate for movements and maintain instrument stability throughout the procedure without requiring manual repositioning or locking operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical locking and positioning mechanisms with an automated robotic manipulation system controlled by software and guided by optical depth data. This substitution eliminates the need for time-consuming manual interactions with locks and adjustment mechanisms while maintaining instrument stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If unique system-specific surgical instruments are used, then compatibility with the robot-assisted system is improved, but adaptability and versatility of the system deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compatibilityVSAvoidinstrument versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm incorporates a universal coupling interface that can accommodate multiple types of surgical instruments including graspers, scissors, retractors, and other standard laparoscopic tools. This universal design allows the system to work with diverse instruments while maintaining reliable control and manipulation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adapts its manipulation strategy based on the specific instrument being used, adjusting grip force, movement speed, and trajectory parameters to optimize performance for each instrument type. This dynamic adaptation enables the system to maintain high reliability and precision across a versatile range of surgical tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables seamless manipulation of surgical instruments, improves workflow efficiency, and enhances safety by reducing manual interaction, allowing surgeons to use standard instruments while maintaining precise control and avoiding collisions.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of optical sensors coupled to the platform and configured to collect depth data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical scanning: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

wherein the controller may be programmed to apply a first impedance to the robot arm in the co-manipulation mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpedance control: Damping

Implementation Method 3

thereby making movement of the robot arm responsive to movement at the handle of the surgical instrument more viscous in the haptic mode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHaptic feedback: Viscoelasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12349995B2Co-manipulation surgical systems having optical sensors for generating graphical displays
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 MOON SURGICAL SAS
  • US12349995B2 patent drawing
  • US12349995B2 patent drawing
  • US12349995B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Co-manipulation robotic systems are described herein that may be used for assisting with laparoscopic surgical procedures. The co-manipulation robotic systems allow a surgeon to use commercially-available surgical tools while providing benefits associated with surgical robotics. Advantageously, the surgical tools may be seamlessly coupled to the robot arms using a disposable coupler while the reusable portions of the robot arm remain in a sterile drape. Further, the co-manipulation robotic system may operate in multiple modes to enhance usability and safety, while allowing the surgeon to position the instrument directly with the instrument handle and further maintain the desired position of the instrument using the robot arm.