Co-molded Electronic Device Case with Flexible Stand

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing portable electronic device cases either have low friction surfaces for easy insertion and removal, which lack impact protection, or high friction surfaces for protection but are difficult to insert and remove, failing to balance both requirements effectively.

Innovation Solution

A case design combining a hard exterior material with a flexible interior material, where the flexible material has a higher coefficient of friction for grip and is positioned both internally and externally to provide shock absorption and protection, and includes a movable stand for elevated positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a hard exterior material is used for the case, then impact protection is improved, but the coefficient of friction is low making insertion and removal difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protectionVSAvoidinsertion and removal
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The case combines a hard exterior material (first material) for impact protection with a softer cushioning material (second material) that has a higher coefficient of friction. This composite material approach allows the case to simultaneously achieve both impact protection and ease of insertion/removal by leveraging the complementary properties of different materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The softer material with higher friction is strategically positioned at specific locations where contact with the user's pocket or hand occurs during insertion and removal. This local quality approach ensures that the friction-enhancing material is present where needed for ease of operation, while the hard material provides overall structural protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If a softer cushioning material with high coefficient of friction is used, then ease of insertion and removal is improved, but impact protection is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion and removalVSAvoidimpact protection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The case uses a composite material structure where a hard exterior material provides the primary impact protection barrier, while a softer cushioning material is integrated to provide both friction enhancement for ease of operation and secondary impact absorption. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by having each material perform its primary function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The softer material is positioned strategically to provide friction enhancement at contact surfaces while the hard material forms the main structural body for impact protection. This spatial differentiation allows the softer material to improve ease of operation without compromising the overall impact protection provided by the hard exterior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If a movable stand is added to the case, then positioning versatility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning optionsVSAvoidcase structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movable stand is integrated into the case structure by coupling it to the hard exterior material through the softer cushioning material. This merging approach combines the stand functionality with the existing case materials, allowing the stand to be positioned and supported without requiring separate complex mounting mechanisms. The softer material serves as both the coupling medium and the friction-enhancing surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The case offers enhanced grip and impact protection while allowing easy insertion and removal, with the flexible material absorbing shocks and distributing impact forces, and the movable stand providing versatile positioning options.

Implementation Method 1

the flexible material having greater flexibility than the first material... the flexible material absorbing shocks and distributing impact forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

The case also includes a second material secured to the first material, the second material having greater flexibility than the first material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8978883B2Electronic device case with a co-molded stand
Publication Date: 2015.03.17 FELLOWES INC
  • US8978883B2 patent drawing
  • US8978883B2 patent drawing
  • US8978883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A case for use with a portable electronic device includes a first material configured to surround a back portion and side portions of the portable electronic device, the first material generally being positioned at an exterior of the case. The case also includes a second material secured to the first material, the second material having greater flexibility than the first material. The case additionally includes a movable stand configured to selectively extend from the first material to support the case in an elevated position. The movable stand is coupled to the first material by the second material.