Co-Packaged Blister Pack Protrusion Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thermoformed blister packs for large-scale production typically have limited strength and rigidity due to manufacturing costs associated with using more rigid materials or thicker plastic sheets, which can lead to compromised structural integrity and increased risk of damage or pilferage when bundling multiple products together.

Innovation Solution

A co-packaged article design featuring inner and outer flange members with protrusions that limit inward and outward flexing, along with a label that interconnects the cavities to enhance structural integrity, allowing for the use of weaker materials while maintaining rigidity and preventing distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If thinner materials are used for thermoforming, then manufacturing costs are reduced and environmental impact is minimized, but the structural integrity and rigidity of the blister pack deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The blister pack is divided into multiple cavities separated by internal walls with protrusions. These protrusions create discrete structural zones that independently reinforce each cavity, allowing the use of thinner overall material while maintaining local rigidity where needed for structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The internal walls contain protrusions that provide localized reinforcement at specific points within the cavities. This concentrates structural strength where most needed (at cavity boundaries and product support points) while allowing thinner material in less critical areas, optimizing the balance between cost and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If thicker plastic sheets or more rigid materials are used, then the strength and rigidity of the blister pack are improved, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using uniformly thick or rigid material throughout, the structure is segmented into cavities with internal walls containing protrusions. This segmentation provides rigidity only where structurally necessary, eliminating the need for expensive thick material in entire packages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design changes the structural parameters by adding geometric features (protrusions) rather than simply increasing material thickness. This achieves rigidity through shape optimization rather than material quantity, reducing manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple products are bundled together in a single pack, then packaging costs are reduced and consumer value is increased, but the risk of damage and pilferage increases due to compromised structural integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging efficiencyVSAvoidprotection against damage and pilferage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple products are placed in separate cavities within a single pack, with internal walls containing protrusions providing structural reinforcement. This segmentation allows efficient bundling of multiple items while the reinforced structure prevents the pack from becoming too flexible or vulnerable to damage and pilferage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The pack combines multiple functional elements (cavities, internal walls, protrusions, labels) into a composite structure that provides both the flexibility needed for bundling multiple products and the rigidity required for protection against damage and pilferage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If protrusions are added to internal walls to limit flexing, then rigidity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The internal walls are segmented with protrusions that create discrete reinforcement zones. This segmentation provides rigidity through simple geometric additions rather than complex overall structural changes, maintaining manufacturability while improving strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides increased rigidity and structural integrity, preventing damage during shipping and handling, while allowing for thermoforming with thinner materials, thus reducing costs and environmental impact, and enhancing consumer perception of product quality.

Implementation Method 1

The protrusion is spaced apart from the first internal wall in the first position and contacts the first internal wall in the second position limiting inward flexing of the first and second cavities toward each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A label interconnects the first and second cavities limiting outward flexing of the first and second cavities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP2516292B1Co-packaged articles
Publication Date: 2015.09.02 THE GILLETTE CO
  • EP2516292B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2516292B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2516292B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A pack (12) for a co-packaged article (12) with an inner flange member (19) and an outer flange member (16). A first cavity (20) is defined by the inner flange member and the outer flange member. The first cavity has an outer surface (22) and a first internal wall (25). A second cavity (30) is defined by the inner flange member and the outer flange member. The second cavity has an outer surface (32) and a second internal wall (35) spaced apart from the first internal wall. The second internal wall has at least one protrusion (36) with a first position and a second position. The protrusion (36) is spaced apart from the first internal wall (25) in the first position and contacts the first internal wall in the second position limiting inward flexing of the first and second cavities (20, 30) toward each other.