Co-phasing Beams for Wireless Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing beam measurements and co-phasing in high mobility scenarios, leading to suboptimal performance and coverage.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising at least one processor and memory configured to receive configuration information for beam measurements, co-phase multiple first beams to form wider second beams, and adapt beam configurations based on mobility detection criteria, such as channel estimation variations or timing offset changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple first beams are co-phased to form wider second beams, then coverage area is improved, but beam measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidbeam measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The beam management process is segmented into two distinct phases: measurement phase using narrow first beams for high precision, and coverage phase using wider second beams formed by co-phasing. This segmentation allows each phase to optimize for its specific requirement without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between using narrow first beams for measurement and wider second beams for coverage based on mobility detection criteria. The beam configuration is not static but adapts to changing channel conditions and mobility states, optimizing both precision and coverage at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If beam configurations are adapted for high mobility scenarios, then adaptability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to mobility conditionsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary beam measurements using narrow first beams to establish baseline channel characteristics before switching to wider second beams for coverage. This preliminary action provides the necessary information to adapt to mobility conditions without requiring complex real-time processing during high mobility states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where measurement results from first beams inform the configuration of second beams. The network entity receives measurement reports and adjusts beam configurations accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to mobility conditions through feedback-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If narrow first beams are used for measurements, then measurement precision is improved, but coverage area deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam measurement precisionVSAvoidcoverage area
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple narrow first beams are merged through co-phasing to form wider second beams. This merging process combines the measurement precision benefits of narrow beams with the coverage benefits of wider beams, achieving both objectives through the combination of multiple beam resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds a temporal dimension to beam management by using narrow beams for initial measurement and then transitioning to wider beams for coverage. This dimensional transition allows the system to achieve both precision and coverage by operating in different temporal phases rather than requiring simultaneous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If co-phasing codebooks are applied to multiple beams, then beam management flexibility is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam management flexibilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Co-phasing codebooks are applied selectively to specific groups of beams rather than uniformly to all beams. This local application of codebooks allows the system to maintain flexibility where needed while reducing computational complexity in areas where full codebook processing is not necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies co-phasing codebooks to a subset of beams (partial action) rather than all beams, or uses pre-computed codebook entries (excessive preparation) to reduce real-time computational requirements. This approach balances flexibility with computational efficiency by not over-processing all beam configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250175964A1Co-phasing beams
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY
  • US20250175964A1 patent drawing
  • US20250175964A1 patent drawing
  • US20250175964A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus may be configured with configuration information for beam measurements for a set of first beams, and then receive second configuration information with an indication to co-phase two or more first beams to one or more second beams. Responsive to the indication, the apparatus co-phases. per a second beam, corresponding two or more first beams to the second beam.