CO Shift Unit Heat Recovery for Syngas Hydrogen Yield

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for converting municipal solid waste into syngas, such as incineration and chemical recycling, face inefficiencies in energy conversion and hydrogen yield, leading to low energy efficiency and significant heat loss during cooling of product gases.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the torrefaction of solid recovered fuel pellets to produce syngas, which is then processed through a CO shift unit and a low temperature heat recovery unit, where the heat energy from cooled syngas is used to heat process water streams, optimizing hydrogen content and energy efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a large excess supply of water steam is used in the CO shift reaction to increase hydrogen output, then the hydrogen content in the product gas increases, but large amounts of water condense during cooling resulting in significant heat loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrogen contentVSAvoidheat loss during cooling
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful heat loss during cooling into a beneficial resource by using the cooling train to generate process steam. The large amounts of water that would otherwise condense and waste heat are instead utilized to produce steam that can be fed back to the CO shift reactor, thereby converting the waste heat into useful energy for the hydrogen production process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the temperature parameter along the cooling train to optimize both hydrogen production and heat recovery. By maintaining specific temperature ranges in different sections of the cooling train, the system allows efficient heat transfer for steam generation while preventing excessive condensation losses, thus balancing hydrogen output with energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of substance

If the product gas is cooled to ambient temperature to condense water, then water removal is achieved, but considerable heat energy is discarded resulting in low energy efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater removalVSAvoidheat energy discarded
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the waste heat from product gas cooling into a valuable resource by generating process steam in the cooling train. Instead of discarding the heat energy during water condensation, the system captures and utilizes this heat to produce steam that feeds back into the CO shift reaction, thereby converting a harmful waste stream into a beneficial input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling train serves multiple functions simultaneously: it cools the product gas to ambient temperature for water removal, generates process steam for the CO shift reactor, and recovers heat energy that would otherwise be wasted. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction between water removal and energy conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Use of energy by moving object

If incineration is used to maximize energy content utilization, then energy recovery is improved, but pollutant emissions increase requiring significant technological efforts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recoveryVSAvoidpollutant emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental operating parameters from combustion conditions (high temperature, oxygen-rich) to pyrolysis conditions (controlled temperature, limited oxygen). This parameter change transforms the process from incineration with high pollutant emissions to chemical recycling with minimal emissions, while still achieving effective energy recovery through syngas production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs an inert or controlled atmosphere during the pyrolysis process, preventing complete combustion and the formation of harmful pollutants such as dioxins and furans. By operating in this controlled environment, the system achieves energy recovery without the pollutant emission problems associated with traditional incineration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

4Ease of manufacture

If chemical recycling via pyrolysis is used to recycle waste contents, then molecular-level recycling is achieved, but hydrogen yield and energy efficiency are inappropriate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical recycling capabilityVSAvoidhydrogen yield
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a CO shift reactor as an intermediary step between pyrolysis and final product generation. This intermediary unit converts carbon monoxide from the pyrolysis gas into additional hydrogen through the water-gas shift reaction, thereby significantly increasing the hydrogen yield while maintaining the chemical recycling approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a continuous process where pyrolysis gas is continuously fed to the CO shift reactor, and the shifted syngas is continuously utilized. This continuous operation maximizes hydrogen production from the chemical recycling process and improves overall energy efficiency by eliminating idle periods and maintaining optimal reaction conditions throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the hydrogen content in the product gas stream and enhances energy efficiency by utilizing low-temperature heat for heating process water, thereby reducing energy waste and improving overall process yield.

Implementation Method 1

a syngas stream comprising the torrefaction syngas is provided to a CO shift unit for reacting at least a part of the carbon monoxide with water steam to carbon dioxide and hydrogen

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWater-gas shift reaction: Chemical Transport Reactions

Implementation Method 2

the shifted syngas is guided through at least two heat exchangers in which the shifted syngas is in thermal exchange with at least two water streams

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 3

The term torrefaction is understood as a substoichiometric oxidization of the solid recovered fuel pellets to generate a raw syngas comprising hydrogen and carbon monoxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSubstoichiometric oxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

The resulting charred pellets are preferably gasified in a gasification unit creating syngas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGasification: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS20240018435A1Co shift unit for the conversion of solid waste into syngas
Publication Date: 2024.01.18 RWE GENERATION NL BV
  • US20240018435A1 patent drawing
  • US20240018435A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The CO shift unit 500 as part of the plant 1 for conversing solid waste into a product gas stream comprising hydrogen allows an energy efficient use of the low temperature heat energy in the low temperature heat recovery unit 524 to heat process water streams used in the plant 1.