CO2 Extraction Recirculation with Sorbent Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for extracting valuable compounds from materials are costly, complex, and often damage the material, particularly when using supercritical CO2, due to high pressure requirements and energy consumption, leading to inefficient removal of contaminants and structural integrity issues in materials like cork and plant-based products.

Innovation Solution

A method involving recirculation of carbon dioxide at controlled pressure and temperature, combined with a sorbent like activated carbon or clay minerals, to selectively extract compounds without significant pressure drops or energy fluctuations, allowing for efficient removal of contaminants while maintaining the material's integrity and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If supercritical CO2 extraction is used to remove contaminants from materials, then extraction efficiency is improved, but equipment cost and operating cost increase due to high pressure requirements and large volumes needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from high (supercritical conditions) to moderate levels, and introduces a co-solvent to enhance extraction efficiency without requiring high pressure equipment, thus reducing equipment cost while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a co-solvent as an intermediary substance that works together with CO2 to enhance extraction efficiency, allowing effective contaminant removal at lower pressures and reducing the need for large CO2 volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If compression-decompression cycles are applied to extract compounds, then extraction is achieved, but the material structural integrity deteriorates due to continuous drying

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction capabilityVSAvoidmaterial structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuous recirculation of CO2 at constant pressure without compression-decompression cycles, enabling continuous extraction while preventing material drying and structural damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prevents material drying by maintaining constant pressure and using recirculation, cushioning against the harmful effects of pressure drops that would otherwise cause structural integrity loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Productivity

If high pressure recirculation is used to improve extraction, then extraction efficiency increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces the pressure parameter from high to moderate levels and uses recirculation to maintain extraction efficiency, significantly reducing the energy required for compression while keeping productivity high

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If additional equipment is added to remove large molecules from extraction fluid, then contaminant removal is improved, but device complexity and maintenance cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant removal efficiencyVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selectively extracts only the desired compounds while leaving large molecules in the solid phase through moderate pressure extraction, eliminating the need for additional separation equipment and reducing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables cost-effective extraction of compounds with minimal impact on nutritional and flavor aspects, achieving low residual levels of harmful substances, making the extracted materials suitable for pharmaceutical or food applications with reduced equipment complexity and energy consumption.

Implementation Method 1

contacting carbon dioxide with the material to dissolve an amount of the at least one extract compound from the material into the carbon dioxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

contacting the carbon dioxide comprising the at least dissolved extract compound with a sorbent to sorb the at least one extract compound onto the sorbent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS20230173405A1Method and apparatus for extraction using carbon dioxide
Publication Date: 2023.06.08 FEYECON DEV & IMPLEMENTATION
  • US20230173405A1 patent drawing
  • US20230173405A1 patent drawing
  • US20230173405A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a method for extraction of at least one extract compound from a material, comprising:a. contacting carbon dioxide with the material to dissolve an amount of the at least one extract compound from the material into the carbon dioxide;b. contacting the carbon dioxide comprising the at least dissolved extract compound with a sorbent to sorb the at least one extract compound onto the sorbent and for regenerating the carbon dioxide;c. recirculating the regenerated carbon dioxide; andd. repeating said recirculating at a constant density of said carbon dioxide of between 100 and 1000 kg/m3, and repeating said recirculating for at least 10 cycles.