CO2 Recovery from Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydraulic fracturing systems face inefficiencies and environmental challenges due to high costs, CO2 availability issues, and significant hydrocarbon gas loss during the flowback period, particularly when using CO2 as a stimulating fluid, as conventional techniques often vent or flare CO2-rich flowback streams due to high variability in flowrates and gas compositions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for processing and purifying the CO2-rich flowback stream at a temporary processing facility (TPF), allowing for the recovery and reuse of the stimulating fluid, which involves transferring the working fluid from the well site to a TPF, purifying it, and then transporting it back to injection sites, optimizing equipment use and reducing waste by managing flowback stream logistics and fluid handling efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If CO2 is used as a stimulating fluid in hydraulic fracturing, then environmental benefits and improved hydrocarbon production are achieved, but high costs and availability issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidCO2 availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a flowback stream processing system that recovers CO2 from produced fluids after hydraulic fracturing. The system separates CO2 from hydrocarbon gases and other components in the flowback stream, then reinjects the recovered CO2 into the formation for enhanced oil recovery, creating a closed-loop system that eliminates waste and reduces the need for external CO2 sourcing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the well's own flowback stream as the source of CO2 for reinjection, making the operation self-sufficient. The CO2 required for enhanced oil recovery is obtained from the well's production fluids rather than requiring external CO2 supply infrastructure, thereby solving the availability and cost issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If conventional techniques are used to handle CO2-rich flowback streams, then operational simplicity is maintained, but significant CO2 loss occurs through venting or flaring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidCO2 loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a separation system that extracts CO2 from the flowback stream by separating it from hydrocarbon gases, water, and other components. The separation process uses pressure differential and phase behavior to isolate CO2, which is then routed to reinjection while other components are handled separately, thereby preventing CO2 loss while maintaining operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of venting or flaring CO2-rich flowback streams as conventional practices do, the system recovers CO2 through separation and reinjects it into the formation. This transforms what would be waste material into a valuable resource for enhanced oil recovery, eliminating CO2 loss while creating additional production value

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If large equipment and storage vessels are deployed for fluid handling, then processing capability is improved, but land area requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capabilityVSAvoidland area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into a single flowback stream processing system that combines separation, purification, and reinjection capabilities. The system processes the entire flowback stream in one integrated unit rather than requiring separate facilities for each function, thereby achieving high processing capability with minimal land area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The flowback stream processing system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it separates CO2 from other components, purifies the CO2, stores it temporarily, and reinjects it into the formation. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate dedicated facilities for each operation, significantly reducing land area requirements while maintaining full processing capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the recovery and reuse of stimulating fluids like CO2, reducing waste and operational costs by stabilizing flowrates and compositions, thereby improving hydrocarbon production and minimizing environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

purifying the working fluid at the current TPF, thereby providing the stimulating fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

The purification system receives a feed stream and separates a first portion of the feed stream into a CO2-rich liquid stream and a CO2-lean gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentUS11326418B2Method and system for managing recovery and re-use of a stimulating fluid from a flowback stream
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US11326418B2 patent drawing
  • US11326418B2 patent drawing
  • US11326418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method includes recovering a stimulating fluid, which includes transferring working fluid having the stimulating fluid from an operating site (102) to a current temporary processing facility (TPF) (110) that is located remotely with respect to the operating site in the geographical region. After purifying the working fluid at the current TPF (110), thereby providing the stimulating fluid, the stimulating fluid is transferred from the current TPF to an injection site (103) that is located remotely with respect to the current TPF and the operating site. The method also includes transporting fluid-handling equipment after a designated condition has been satisfied. The fluid-handling equipment is transported from the current TPF (110) to a new TPF (110). The recovering of the stimulating fluid, the transferring of the stimulating fluid, and the transporting of the fluid-handling equipment is repeated a plurality of times. The current and new TPFs are at different locations within the geographical region.