Carbon Dioxide Reduction with Elemental Sulfur Catalyst

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for converting carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide are inefficient due to high energy consumption, catalyst deactivation, and the need for expensive hydrogen or oxygen, making them not commercially viable.

Innovation Solution

Reducing carbon dioxide with elemental sulfur to produce carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide at lower temperatures without the need for water, oxygen, or hydrogen, using a catalyst such as molybdenum or zinc sulfide, which allows for the production of additional valuable chemicals like carbonyl sulfide.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If common methods such as methane steam reforming or dry reforming are used to produce syngas, then carbon monoxide can be produced, but high energy consumption and catalyst deactivation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon monoxide productionVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the reaction parameters by using a specific catalyst system (metal oxide or metal sulfide) that enables the reaction to proceed at lower temperatures (400-800°C) compared to conventional methods requiring 1000°C or higher, thereby reducing energy consumption while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary substance (carbonaceous material such as coal, biomass, or carbon black) that acts as a reducing agent to convert carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide, eliminating the need for high-energy steam reforming or dry reforming processes and preventing catalyst deactivation associated with those methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If catalyst reduction of carbon dioxide using hydrogen is used, then carbon monoxide can be produced, but hydrogen availability and cost become problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon monoxide productionVSAvoidhydrogen availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive hydrogen with cheap, abundant carbonaceous materials (coal, biomass, carbon black) as the reducing agent. These inexpensive carbon-based substances serve the same functional purpose of reducing CO2 to CO without the supply and cost constraints of hydrogen

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses carbonaceous materials that are widely available and can be processed to generate the necessary reducing capacity in situ, eliminating dependence on external hydrogen supply chains and making the process self-sufficient regarding reducing agent availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If carbonaceous fuel with sulfur is used to produce carbon monoxide, then carbon monoxide can be produced, but high reaction temperatures greater than 1000°C are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarbon monoxide productionVSAvoidreaction temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces metal oxide or metal sulfide catalysts as intermediaries that facilitate the reduction reaction at lower temperatures. These catalysts provide an alternative reaction pathway with lower activation energy, enabling CO production at 400-800°C instead of requiring temperatures above 1000°C

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the temperature parameter by using catalytic materials that shift the optimal reaction temperature range from above 1000°C to 400-800°C, making the process more energy-efficient while maintaining high carbon monoxide production rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces energy requirements and costs, enabling the efficient conversion of carbon dioxide and elemental sulfur into valuable chemical products like carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbonyl sulfide, while minimizing natural gas consumption and avoiding the complexities of hydrogen or oxygen introduction.

Implementation Method 1

contacting the reaction mixture with a catalyst under conditions sufficient to produce a product stream comprising CO(g) and SO2(g), wherein the catalyst comprises a metal sulfide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Carbon dioxide and sulfur are reacted together to produce carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentEP3212574B1Carbon monoxide production from carbon dioxide reduction by elemental sulfur
Publication Date: 2023.06.21 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • EP3212574B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3212574B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3212574B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed is a method of producing carbon monoxide (CO) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), the method comprising obtaining a reaction mixture comprising carbon dioxide gas (CO2(g)) and elemental sulfur gas (S(g)), and subjecting the reaction mixture to conditions sufficient to produce a product stream comprising CO(g) and SO2(g).