CO2 Liquefaction Stages Using Flue Gas Self-Cooling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) systems have high capital costs and environmental impacts due to the use of external refrigeration systems and refrigerants with high global warming potential, and they often require complex retrofits to meet the objectives of flexible carbon capture and storage (FLECCS) in power plants.

Innovation Solution

A CCS system that uses flue gas as the refrigerant, employing a modular design with a series of cooling and expansion stages to liquefy and separate CO2, utilizing heat exchangers and expanders to extract solid CO2, thereby reducing capital costs and environmental footprint.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional amine carbon capture technology is used, then CO2 separation is achieved through reversible reactions, but capital costs increase to 4 or more times that of cryogenic systems

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 separation efficiencyVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the CO2 component from the flue gas stream through cryogenic cooling and phase separation, isolating it as a distinct liquid or solid phase that can be easily separated from the remaining gas stream, thereby achieving high separation efficiency without requiring expensive amine chemicals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the temperature parameter of the flue gas from ambient conditions to cryogenic temperatures (below -78.5°C), causing CO2 to undergo phase changes from gas to solid dry ice or liquid, which enables separation based on phase differences rather than chemical reactions, significantly reducing capital costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If externally cooled cryogenic carbon capture is used, then heat exchange efficiency is improved with smaller temperature differences, but capital cost increases due to bigger heat exchangers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange efficiencyVSAvoidcapital cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a self-cooling mechanism where the flue gas itself is cooled by expanding through a valve or turbine, causing adiabatic cooling and temperature drop without requiring external refrigeration systems or large heat exchangers, thereby achieving efficient cooling at lower capital cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical external refrigeration system with a thermodynamic expansion process, where the gas undergoes adiabatic expansion through a valve or turbine to achieve cooling, substituting complex mechanical refrigeration equipment with a simpler thermodynamic process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If externally cooled cryogenic carbon capture is used, then CO2 capture is achieved, but system complexity increases due to specialized refrigerants and multiple heat pump subsystems

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO2 capture capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the flue gas serve multiple functions: it is the process stream being treated, the cooling medium through adiabatic expansion, and the source of the separated CO2 product, eliminating the need for separate refrigeration systems and specialized refrigerants, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining capture capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the CO2 from the flue gas stream through cryogenic separation and removes the need for external refrigeration subsystems by using the flue gas itself for cooling through expansion, simplifying the overall system architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Temperature

If R-14 refrigerant is used in externally cooled cryogenic systems, then cooling is achieved, but environmental impact increases due to high global warming potential

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling capabilityVSAvoidglobal warming potential
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful high-GWP refrigerant into a beneficial role by using the flue gas itself as the cooling medium through adiabatic expansion, turning a source of CO2 emissions into a useful cooling resource, thereby eliminating the need for harmful refrigerants like R-14

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The flue gas serves its own cooling function through adiabatic expansion, eliminating the need for external refrigeration systems that would require harmful refrigerants, making the system environmentally friendly while achieving the required cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves high capture efficiency with low capital costs, minimizing the use of external refrigerants and avoiding complex refrigeration systems, resulting in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly CO2 capture process.

Implementation Method 1

a first cooling stage to cool flue gas with liquid CO2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

a compression stage coupled to the first cooling stage to compress the cooled flue gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

a second cooling stage coupled to the compression stage and the first cooling stage to cool the compressed flue gas with a CO2 melt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 4

an expansion stage coupled to the second cooling stage to extract solid CO2 from the flue gas that melts in the second cooling stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule-Thomson effect: Joule-Thomson Effect

Implementation Method 5

extract solid CO2 from the flue gas that melts in the second cooling stage to provide the liquid CO2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP3948125B1Co2 separation & liquefaction system and method
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 FROSTCARBON INC
  • EP3948125B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3948125B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3948125B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A CO2 separation and liquefaction system such as might be used in a carbon capture and sequestration system for a fossil fuel burning power plant is disclosed. The CO2 separation and liquefaction system includes a first cooling stage to cool flue gas with liquid CO2, a compression stage coupled to the first cooling stage to compress the cooled flue gas, a second cooling stage coupled to the compression stage and the first cooling stage to cool the compressed flue gas with a CO2 melt and provide the liquid CO2 to the first cooling stage, and an expansion stage coupled to the second cooling stage to extract solid CO2 from the flue gas that melts in the second cooling stage to provide the liquid CO2.