Coal Blending Optimization System for Power Plant Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current power plant operations face challenges in optimizing coal selection and blending due to inherent variations in coal properties, difficulty in real-time monitoring, and reliance on operator expertise, leading to suboptimal equipment performance and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising an input module, hardware processors, and predictive models (physics-based, knowledge-based, and data-driven) to optimize coal selection and blending ratios, providing real-time advisory and optimization for power plant operations, including a coal usage advisory module and performance optimization module.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If coal blending is done based on operator expertise and experience, then operational flexibility is maintained, but manufacturing precision and optimization are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidblending ratio precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of coal properties and predicts optimal blending ratios before actual blending occurs. By pre-processing coal samples and analyzing their characteristics, the system determines the ideal blend composition in advance, ensuring both precision and operational efficiency without relying solely on operator experience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where actual coal properties are measured, compared against target specifications, and used to adjust blending ratios in real-time. This closed-loop control ensures manufacturing precision while maintaining operational flexibility through automated adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple types of coal are stored and blended, then economic efficiency improves, but device complexity and control difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeconomic efficiencyVSAvoidblending system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service operation where the blending system automatically manages multiple coal types without requiring complex manual intervention. The automated system handles coal identification, blending ratio calculation, and process control, reducing operational complexity while maintaining the economic benefits of multi-coal blending

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts blending parameters based on coal properties and plant requirements. By changing operational parameters automatically rather than maintaining fixed complex procedures, the system achieves economic efficiency from diverse coal blending while keeping control mechanisms manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time coal property monitoring is implemented, then manufacturing precision improves, but measurement precision requirements and system cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoal property controlVSAvoidproperty measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial monitoring by focusing measurements on the most critical coal properties that significantly impact blending decisions. Rather than measuring all possible properties with high precision, the system identifies and monitors only the key parameters needed for effective blending control, reducing measurement complexity while maintaining manufacturing precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If coal blending is optimized for minimum operating cost, then economic efficiency improves, but adaptability to different operational zones decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost efficiencyVSAvoidoperational zone flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts blending strategies based on the current operational zone and plant requirements. Rather than using a fixed blending ratio optimized for minimum cost, the system continuously adapts the blending composition to match varying operational conditions, maintaining both cost efficiency and adaptability through real-time optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3977049B1Method and system for optimum coal selection and power plant optimization
Publication Date: 2024.09.25 TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD
  • EP3977049B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3977049B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3977049B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Performance optimization of power plants is one of the major challenge. Several machine learning based techniques are available which are used for optimization of the power plants. Coal selection and blending is critical to ensuring optimum operation of thermal power plants. The present disclosure provides a system and method for optimum coal selection for the power plant and power plant optimization. The system mainly comprises two components. First, a coal usage advisory module providing coal usage and blending ratio advice to the operators based on the available coal. The optimization is with respect to the entire power plant operation including its components. And second, a performance optimization advisory module provides operation instruction for boiler, SCR, APH and other power plant equipment based on the implemented coal blend in real-time.