Co-grinding Coal and Plastic Pellets for Furnace Injection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for co-firing secondary fuels like wood pellets or plastic waste in industrial furnaces using powdered coal are limited by milling operations and burning efficiency, often requiring separate milling or injection, which is costly and inefficient, especially when using plastic-containing waste that can melt and cause processing issues.

Innovation Solution

A process that co-grinds coal or cokes with cellulose and plastic pellets larger than 3 mm to a powder with 95% of particles smaller than 2 mm, using roller or ball mills, allowing direct injection into the furnace flame without separate milling or injection, maintaining high throughput and low maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate milling or injection is used for co-firing secondary fuels, then burning efficiency is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburning efficiencyVSAvoidseparate milling or injection system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the milling of coal and secondary fuels (cellulose and plastic pellets) into a single integrated milling process using roller or ball mills. This eliminates the need for separate milling operations and separate injection systems, reducing device complexity while maintaining effective co-firing. The mixed powder is then injected through a single system into the furnace flame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Use of energy by moving object

If plastic-containing waste is used as secondary fuel, then caloric value is improved, but fouling issues occur in milling equipment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecaloric valueVSAvoidfouling in milling equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operating parameters of the milling equipment, specifically using roller mills or ball mills that operate at controlled temperatures and with specific mechanical actions that prevent plastic melting and fouling. The milling process is optimized to handle plastic-containing pellets without causing the plastic to melt and adhere to equipment surfaces, thereby maintaining high caloric value utilization while avoiding fouling problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If direct co-firing without separate injection is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision of powder particle size is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemilling and injection systemVSAvoidparticle size distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs roller mills or ball mills that are designed to handle multiple types of materials (coal and plastic-containing pellets) simultaneously while achieving the required particle size distribution. These mills serve multiple functions: grinding coal, grinding pellets, and producing a mixed powder with controlled particle size characteristics suitable for direct injection into the furnace.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If elevated temperatures are used in milling, then burning efficiency is improved, but plastic melting and fouling increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveburning efficiencyVSAvoidplastic melting and fouling
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the milling temperature parameter to remain below the melting point of plastic while still achieving effective grinding and preparation of the fuel mixture. The milling process operates at moderate temperatures that prevent plastic softening and fouling, yet the resulting powder maintains good combustion characteristics when injected into the high-temperature furnace environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enables efficient co-firing of secondary fuels with coal or cokes, achieving higher caloric values and reduced CO2 emissions, with no fouling issues in the milling equipment, even at elevated temperatures, and allows for higher plastic content without compromising burner efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

co-grinded to a powder with a particle size wherein 95 wt% or more of the powder has a particle size smaller than 2 mm using roller or ball mills

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical grinding: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The ground fuel powder is blown into the furnace by means of a flow gas, usually air, which generally is heated till at least about 200 °C or higher

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow transport: Advection

Implementation Method 3

the powder is injected in the flame of the furnace

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentEP3129451B1Process for firing an industrial furnace using coal or cokes with a secondary fuel
Publication Date: 2020.03.18 SUBCOAL INT BV

AI summary

The invention relates to a process for firing an industrial furnace, in particular for electricity generation, wherein coal or cokes together with a secondary fuel comprising cellulose and plastic, in the form of pellets of a size larger than about 3 mm thickness, and having a caloric value of about 16 GJ/ton or more is ground to a powder wherein about 95 wt% or more has a particle size smaller than 2 mm and wherein the d50 of the particle size distribution is between about 5 and about 100 µm, wherein the powder is injected in the flame of the furnace. In this process the grinding is performed in a roller mill or ball mill, and the amount of pellets used together with the coals preferably is about 3 wt% or more, relative to the coal.