Coated Art Material System Using Chemical Erasure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing art systems for children, such as marker kits and scratch art, pose safety concerns and mess issues due to the need for physical removal of coatings to reveal hidden layers, which can be cumbersome and hazardous.

Innovation Solution

A system featuring a substrate coated with a chemically reactive opaque coating that becomes transparent upon application of a reducing fluid, allowing users to reveal hidden images or layers through a chemical reaction, eliminating the need for physical removal and associated safety risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a wax, ink, or paint coating is applied to a surface for scratch art, then a hidden layer can be revealed by mechanical removal, but safety issues arise due to the need for sharp implements and mess is produced from shavings and residue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of revealing hidden layerVSAvoidsafety hazards and mess
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical scratching system with a chemical reaction system. Instead of using sharp implements to physically remove the coating, a reducing agent is applied that chemically reacts with the coating to change its properties, causing it to become transparent or fall away harmlessly. This substitution eliminates safety hazards associated with sharp objects and prevents mess from mechanical shavings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the coating through a reducing agent reaction. The coating undergoes a chemical transformation where its molecular structure is altered, changing its optical properties from opaque to transparent. This parameter change allows the hidden layer to be revealed without mechanical force, avoiding safety issues and mess.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If an eradicator ink fluid is used to react with colored ink, then the colored ink can be rendered colorless, but children can still make marks anywhere with the colored markers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to erase marksVSAvoidcontrol of mark placement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-coating the substrate with an opaque coating that contains the reducing agent or is designed to react with it. This preparation ensures that when the reducing agent is applied, the coating will reliably react and reveal the hidden layer only where intended, providing better control over mark placement while maintaining the erasing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If a sharp implement is used to physically remove the coating in scratch art, then the hidden design can be revealed, but safety concerns increase especially with children

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of revealing designVSAvoidsafety concerns
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical scratching system with a chemical reaction system. Instead of using sharp implements to physically remove the coating, a reducing agent is applied that chemically reacts with the coating to change its properties, causing it to become transparent or fall away harmlessly. This substitution eliminates safety hazards associated with sharp objects while maintaining precision in revealing the hidden design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If mechanical removal of coating is used, then hidden layers are revealed, but mess is produced from shavings and residue

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to reveal hidden layerVSAvoidmess from shavings and residue
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the coating through a reducing agent reaction. The coating undergoes a chemical transformation where its molecular structure is altered, changing its optical properties from opaque to transparent. This parameter change allows the hidden layer to be revealed without mechanical force, preventing mess from shavings and residue while maintaining precision in revealing the hidden design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and mess-free revelation of hidden images or layers by using a marker to apply a reducing fluid, reacting with the coating to render it transparent, thus addressing safety and cleanliness concerns in art systems for children.

Implementation Method 1

the eradicator fluid reacts with the coating, specifically the dye in the coating, to reveal what is underneath the coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

The eradicator fluid contains a reducing agent that reacts with the dye in the coating. The dye in the coating is selected such that its coloring ability is destroyed in the presence of a reducing agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS7521112B2Coated art material system
Publication Date: 2009.04.21 CRAYOLA LLC
  • US7521112B2 patent drawing
  • US7521112B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is a system for hiding and later revealing a hidden layer. The system includes a substrate and applicator. As the user moves the applicator around the substrate, a coating is rendered transparent to reveal a hidden layer under the pattern of the user's movement of the applicator. The system comprises a substrate at least partially coated with a generally opaque coating that reacts with an eradicator fluid. A preferred coating as applied to the substrate comprises 20-80 wt % water, 0-3 wt % defoamer, 0-3 wt % surfactant, 0-5 wt % wetting agent, 1-25 wt % colorant, 1-60 wt % resin, and 0-4 wt % preservatives. A preferred reducing fluid in such case comprises 30-95 wt % water, 1-5 wt % pH adjuster, 5-15 wt % reducing agent, 0-5 wt % surfactant, and 2-10 wt % buffer.