Coating Process Anomaly Detection for Real-Time Defect Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quality control in coating systems for automotive body components is manual, error-prone, and heavily dependent on expert experience, making it inefficient in detecting and correcting quality defects in real-time.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a machine learning algorithm to determine quality-relevant anomalies in process values during the coating process, enabling the detection of coating defects before they occur and providing automatic optimization proposals to improve coating quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual quality control by expert is used, then quality defects can be detected based on experience, but the process is error-prone and heavily dependent on expert experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control reliabilityVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service quality control by automatically evaluating coating quality parameters and determining process value adjustments without requiring expert intervention. The automated system evaluates quality characteristics, determines cause categories, and suggests process adjustments independently, making the system self-sufficient in quality control tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual expert-based mechanical decision-making process with an automated computer-based system. The control computer automatically evaluates quality parameters, determines anomalies, identifies cause categories, and generates process value suggestions, substituting human expert mechanics with automated computational mechanics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If try-and-error principle is used to determine causes of quality defects, then process values can be adjusted, but the process is time-consuming and efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality defect detection accuracyVSAvoidquality control efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively detecting quality anomalies and determining cause categories before actual quality defects occur. The automated system continuously monitors quality parameters and identifies potential issues in advance, allowing preventive adjustments rather than reactive try-and-error approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously evaluating quality characteristics and using the results to automatically determine process value adjustments. The system creates a closed-loop feedback mechanism where quality measurements directly inform process corrections, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual trial-and-error cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If automated evaluation of quality characteristics is implemented, then objectivity and speed are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality measurement accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control computer performs multiple functions including quality parameter evaluation, anomaly detection, cause category determination, and process value suggestion generation. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single universal control platform, managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges quality evaluation, anomaly detection, cause analysis, and process optimization functions into a single integrated automated system. By combining these functions in one control computer, the system achieves high measurement precision without the complexity of multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If real-time quality monitoring is implemented, then defect prevention is improved, but data processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect prevention capabilityVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential quality parameters and anomaly indicators from the continuous data stream for detailed analysis. By taking out and focusing on critical quality characteristics rather than processing all raw data, the system achieves real-time defect prevention while managing data processing requirements efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250135480A1Operating method for a coating system, and coating system for carrying out the operating method
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 DUERR SYST AG
  • US20250135480A1 patent drawing
  • US20250135480A1 patent drawing
  • US20250135480A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to an operating method for a coating system for coating components (e.g. motor vehicle body components) with a coating agent (e.g. paint) by means of an applicator (e.g. rotary atomizer), including the following, The components may be coated with the coating agent, whereby component-related process values are obtained which represent operating variables of devices of the coating system during the coating of the individual components, and whereby a specific component-related coating quality results during the coating of the individual component. Component related process values of the coating system may be determined. Quality relevant anomalies in the process values may be determined. The position of the coating defects corresponding to the anomalies may be determined.