Feedback-Controlled Coating Systems for Stable Layer Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coating processes in manufacturing environments suffer from batch-to-batch variations due to system wear, operator influence, and material deposits, requiring time-consuming and material-intensive iterative adjustments by skilled operators, which can lead to inconsistent layer thickness ratios and unintentional changes in layer properties.

Innovation Solution

A method involving spectral measurement, simulation, and feedback-based control to optimize layer thicknesses using iterative procedures, allowing for self-controlling and feedback-based operation of coating systems, utilizing simulation software to adjust layer thicknesses numerically and monitor process parameters for consistent results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If experience-based iterative adjustments are made by skilled operators, then coating process variations can be minimized, but the process becomes time-consuming and material-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of layer propertiesVSAvoidtime for process maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where measured layer thicknesses from optical measurements are compared against target values, and correction values are automatically calculated and applied to subsequent coating batches. This closed-loop feedback system eliminates the need for manual iterative adjustments by operators, maintaining consistency while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction by automatically calculating correction values based on measured deviations and applying them to subsequent batches without requiring skilled operators. The coating system serves itself by using the measurement data to automatically adjust process parameters, eliminating manual intervention and reducing maintenance time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual corrections are made to layer thickness, then spectral profile deviations can be corrected, but layer thickness ratios may change unintentionally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral profile accuracyVSAvoidlayer thickness ratios
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system calculates correction values that are specifically designed to restore target layer thickness ratios while achieving the desired spectral profile. Rather than making arbitrary manual adjustments, the system computes precise correction amounts that maintain the intended layer thickness relationships across all layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the process parameters (layer thicknesses) in a controlled and calculated manner based on measured deviations. By using numerical optimization and correction algorithms, the system adjusts parameters to achieve spectral profile accuracy while maintaining stable layer thickness ratios, avoiding the unintentional changes that occur with manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If iterative trial-and-error process is used, then spectral parameters can be optimized, but material consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespectral parameter accuracyVSAvoidcoating material consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements on a test substrate before full production coating. The correction values are calculated in advance based on these preliminary results, allowing the main production batch to be coated with the pre-calculated corrected parameters. This eliminates the need for multiple iterative coating attempts, significantly reducing material consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error process with a numerical calculation system. Instead of physically coating multiple batches to find the correct parameters, the system uses optical measurements and computational algorithms to calculate the optimal correction values, substituting physical iteration with mathematical optimization to reduce material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If skilled operators perform process maintenance, then coating variations can be controlled, but operator dependency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating batch consistencyVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The coating system performs process maintenance automatically without requiring skilled operators. The system measures layer thicknesses, calculates correction values, and applies corrections to subsequent batches autonomously. This self-service capability maintains coating consistency while eliminating dependency on operator expertise, making the process easier to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated feedback system continuously monitors coating results and automatically adjusts process parameters, replacing the need for skilled operators to manually assess and correct variations. The feedback loop maintains reliability by ensuring consistent corrections are applied, while simultaneously reducing ease of operation requirements by removing the need for specialized operator knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables comprehensive analytical control of coating processes, reducing deviations from target data, ensuring consistent layer properties, and allowing for automatic optimization and cost savings by preventing defective batches and simplifying maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

an optical measuring device for determining a spectrally resolved actual measurement curve of the layer system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpectral measurement: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4451039B1System of coating installations for producing layer systems
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 RODENSTOCK GMBH
  • EP4451039B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4451039B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4451039B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a self-controlling, feedback-controlled method for operating at least one coating system (108) for producing layer systems (10), a method for producing a layer system (10) in at least one coating system (108), a method for starting up a coating process in at least one coating system (108) for producing a layer system (10), a coating system (100) for producing a layer system (10), a coating system (108) for producing a layer system (10), a system (200) of coating systems (108) for producing layer systems (10), a database (106) for storing system data records (DAT), a computer program product for a method for operating at least one coating system (108), and a data processing system (124) for executing a data processing program.