Coating Particulate Material via Atomized Spray and Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for coating landscaping materials like wood mulch lack efficient control over the coating process, particularly in ensuring uniform application and adjustment based on the volumetric feed rate of particulate material, leading to inconsistencies in coating distribution and residence time within the mixing chamber.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a mixer and agitator system that includes a coating feed system delivering an atomized spray, controlled by sensors measuring the particulate material's feed rate, ensuring precise adjustment of coating flow and distribution through a network of spray nozzles, and utilizing a pressurized water carrier for efficient atomization without the need for compressed gas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a multistage mixing bowl is used for continuous mixing of colorant with mulch material, then mixing capability is improved, but control precision over coating flow and distribution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous mixing capabilityVSAvoidcoating flow control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that detect the volumetric feed rate of particulate material and provide feedback to a controller. The controller automatically adjusts the coating feed rate to match the feed rate, ensuring precise control over coating distribution while maintaining continuous mixing operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The coating delivery system transitions from static batch application to dynamic continuous spraying. The atomized spray nozzles deliver coating material continuously as the particulate material moves through the mixing chamber, allowing real-time adjustment of coating flow to match varying feed rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If coating is applied without adjustment based on volumetric feed rate, then process simplicity is maintained, but coating uniformity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcoating uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors measure the volumetric feed rate of particulate material entering the mixing chamber and provide this information to a controller. The controller automatically adjusts the coating feed rate accordingly, maintaining coating uniformity without requiring complex manual intervention or overly complicated equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses sensors and controllers to automatically monitor and adjust the coating process based on actual feed conditions. This self-regulating mechanism maintains coating uniformity without requiring constant operator attention or complex procedural interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If compressed gas is used for atomization, then atomization capability is achieved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatomization capabilityVSAvoidcompressed gas system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses hydraulic pressure from a liquid carrier (water or other liquid) instead of pneumatic compressed gas to achieve atomization. The pressurized liquid flows through the atomizing nozzle, creating a fine spray of coating material without requiring compressed air or gas systems, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining effective atomization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Ease of operation

If coating feed rate is not adjusted to match feed rate, then operational simplicity is maintained, but processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives feedback from sensors about the volumetric feed rate and automatically adjusts the coating feed rate to match. This maintains operational simplicity from the user perspective while significantly improving processing efficiency by ensuring optimal coating application at all times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual adjustment mechanisms are replaced with an automated control system that uses sensors and electronic control to adjust coating feed rate. This substitution improves processing efficiency while maintaining ease of operation, as the system self-regulates without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves uniform coating distribution, reduces processing time, and enhances adhesion and uniformity of the coating on particulate materials by accurately matching coating flow with the feed rate, resulting in a more efficient and consistent coating process.

Implementation Method 1

The coating is delivered as an atomized spray directed towards the mixing particulate material. The pressurized carrier may be provided at relatively high pressure, preferably at least about 689.5 kPa (100 psi).

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid spray atomization: Fluid Spray

Data Source

PatentUS9950331B2Apparatus and method for coating particulate material
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 COLORBIOTICS LLC
  • US9950331B2 patent drawing
  • US9950331B2 patent drawing
  • US9950331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus are defined for coating a particulate material. The apparatus includes a mixer having a mixing chamber. A quantity of particulate material is fed into an inlet of the mixing chamber. An agitator is provided for mixing and conveying the particulate material. A feed system is also provided for delivery of a coating into the mixing chamber. The coating is delivered as an atomized spray directed at the mixing particulate material within the mixing chamber. A controller is provided for adjusting the flow of the coating into the mixing chamber based on the volumetric feed rate of the particulate material.