Coating Robot Programming for Homogeneous Spray Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for programming painting installations for motor vehicle body components are time-consuming and costly, requiring extensive iteration loops for optimizing robot paths and application parameters, and newer simulation-based approaches are computationally intensive, making them impractical.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves determining geometry and robot path data, simulating spray pattern data to achieve an acceptable coating result, and optimizing both spray pattern and robot path data in a series of iteration loops, with the goal of reducing computational effort and improving practicality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If physical simulation is used to optimize robot path and application parameters, then coating thickness distribution is improved, but computational effort and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating thickness distributionVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual model (digital twin) of the coating installation that replicates the physical system's behavior. This virtual model allows optimization of coating parameters through simulation without requiring repeated physical tests, thus reducing both time and material consumption while maintaining optimization quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of the robot path and application parameters using the virtual model before actual painting operations. By pre-calculating optimal parameters in the virtual environment, the system avoids time-consuming trial-and-error physical testing, thereby reducing calculation time and resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If iteration loops are used to optimize application parameters and robot path, then coating homogeneity is improved, but time and material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating homogeneityVSAvoidprogramming time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a virtual model to replicate the coating process, allowing multiple iteration loops to be executed in silico without consuming physical paint or requiring test car bodies. This maintains the ability to optimize coating homogeneity through iterations while eliminating material costs and reducing time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the virtual model evaluates coating results and automatically adjusts application parameters and robot path in successive iteration loops. This automated feedback-driven optimization achieves homogeneous coating while reducing manual programming time and eliminating the need for physical test runs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If physical painting tests on test car bodies are conducted, then application parameters are optimized, but paint material and test car body costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication parameter optimizationVSAvoidpaint material consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy of the painting installation and test car bodies, enabling virtual painting tests that optimize application parameters without consuming actual paint material. The virtual model accurately predicts coating outcomes, eliminating the need for expensive physical test runs while maintaining optimization quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual model performs self-validation by automatically evaluating coating results and adjusting parameters without requiring external physical testing. This self-service capability eliminates the need for consumable test materials while maintaining rigorous optimization standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20230234088A1Programming method for a coating installation, and corresponding coating installation
Publication Date: 2023.07.27 DUERR SYST AG
  • US20230234088A1 patent drawing
  • US20230234088A1 patent drawing
  • US20230234088A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a method for programming a program-controlled coating installation with a coating robot and an application device for coating components, in particular for programming a painting installation with a painting robot for painting motor vehicle body components, with the following steps (S1-S3):a) Presetting or determining geometry data of the component to be coated (S1),b) presetting of robot path data of the robot path to be traversed (S2), andc) determination of suitable spray pattern data (S3) which represent a layer thickness profile and are determined by a simulation which takes into account the robot path data and the geometry data of the component to be coated.Furthermore, the disclosure comprises an appropriately adapted coating installation.