Cobalt CMP Slurry Composition for Corrosion and Dishing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CMP slurries designed for copper and tungsten cause unacceptable corrosion and defects in cobalt layers due to cobalt's chemical fragility, leading to etching and device failure.

Innovation Solution

A polishing slurry concentrate comprising a synergistic combination of an anionic surfactant with phosphate groups and benzotriazole derivatives, along with selected abrasives and cobalt removal rate enhancers, is used to form a point-of-use slurry that protects cobalt while achieving high removal rates for other materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional slurries with silica particles and tartaric acid are used for cobalt CMP, then the slurry can perform basic polishing, but it causes excessive dishing and fails to achieve desired surface flatness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface flatnessVSAvoiddishing
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the slurry by replacing tartaric acid with gluconic acid and adjusting particle size distribution. This chemical parameter change fundamentally alters the interaction between slurry and cobalt surface, reducing dishing while maintaining polishing effectiveness and achieving desired surface flatness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite abrasive system combining sub-10nm and sub-25nm particles with gluconic acid. This composite material approach creates synergistic effects where the multi-component slurry formulation achieves both effective material removal and controlled surface morphology, preventing excessive dishing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If sub-10nm particles are used to achieve fine surface finish, then surface quality improves, but the polishing rate decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface finish qualityVSAvoidpolishing rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the abrasive particle size distribution into multiple ranges (sub-10nm and sub-25nm particles). This segmentation allows different particle sizes to perform different functions: finer particles provide surface finishing while coarser particles contribute to material removal, thereby maintaining both high surface quality and acceptable polishing rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the concentration and size distribution parameters of abrasive particles in the slurry. By carefully controlling particle concentration and size distribution, the slurry achieves enhanced polishing rate while maintaining fine surface finish quality through the synergistic action of multiple particle sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If slurry formulations are optimized for high polishing rate, then productivity improves, but control over surface morphology and dishing worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolishing rateVSAvoidsurface morphology control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes multiple slurry parameters simultaneously: chemical composition (gluconic acid instead of tartaric acid), particle size distribution (bimodal distribution of sub-10nm and sub-25nm particles), and concentrations. This multi-parameter optimization enables the slurry to achieve high polishing rate while maintaining excellent control over surface morphology and minimizing dishing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The slurry effectively reduces cobalt corrosion, minimizes defects like dishing and edge of erosion, and maintains optimal removal rates for common wafer materials like TEOS, while ensuring low etch rates and precise material interface management.

Implementation Method 1

Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is a planarization process that utilizes a slurry and a polishing pad to remove material from a substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

The slurry of the present disclosure has been found to be particularly useful for polishing cobalt and cobalt alloy barriers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChelation:

Data Source

PatentEP3631045B1Chemical mechanical polishing slurry for cobalt applications
Publication Date: 2026.02.18 FUJIFILM ELECTRONIC MATERIALS U S A INC
  • EP3631045B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3631045B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3631045B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A slurry that polishes surfaces or substrates which includes cobalt. The slurry further comprises an anionic and/or cationic surfactant, each of which has a phosphate group, a long chain alkyl group, or both. The slurry also includes a corrosion inhibitor, abrasives, removal rate enhancers, solvents, pH adjustors, and chelating agents. The pH of the slurry is preferably 8 or higher.