Collaborative Robot Retreat Control for Safe Multi-Robot Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collaborative robots face challenges in ensuring safety when sharing workspaces with humans, particularly in complying with ISO 10218-1 standards and effectively handling collisions and retreat functions.

Innovation Solution

A collaborative robot system equipped with external force sensors, a collision detector, an operation determinator, and a retreat controller that switches operation modes and performs coordinated retreat operations to ensure safety, including mirrored or cooperative retreats based on the nature of the collision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If collaborative robots are equipped with collision detection and retreat functions to ensure safety, then operator safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device is divided into multiple functional modules: collision detection unit that monitors external forces, operation determination unit that decides robot responses, and retreat control unit that executes separation movements. This segmentation allows each module to handle specific safety tasks independently, improving overall safety while keeping individual module complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary collision detection by continuously monitoring external forces applied to the robot arm before actual contact occurs. When a collision is detected, the retreat function is activated in advance to move the robot arm away from the operator, preventing harmful effects before they can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the robot performs retreat operation when collision is detected, then operator safety is improved, but work continuity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidwork continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot operates in periodic cycles of autonomous operation and standby mode. During autonomous operation, the robot performs tasks efficiently. When collision is detected, it transitions to standby mode for retreat operation, then can resume autonomous operation, creating a periodic pattern that balances safety interventions with continuous productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors external forces applied to the robot arm and uses this feedback to determine when retreat operations are necessary. The operation determination unit processes collision detection signals and triggers appropriate responses, allowing the system to maintain normal operation during feedback monitoring while intervening only when safety requires it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the robot switches from autonomous operation mode to standby mode upon collision detection, then operator safety is improved, but operational efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot control system dynamically switches between autonomous operation mode and standby mode based on real-time collision detection. During normal operation, the robot operates autonomously for high efficiency. Upon detecting external forces indicating collision, it dynamically transitions to standby mode to execute safety protocols, then can return to autonomous mode when safe, creating a dynamic response that optimizes both safety and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety by allowing operators to safely escape from collaborative robots by maintaining a safe distance and preventing workpiece drops, even in complex operational scenarios.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of robots 102A and 102B equipped with external force sensors 112a and 112b

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Data Source

PatentUS20260003373A1Collaborative robot system
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 NACHI FUJIKOSHI CORP
  • US20260003373A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003373A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003373A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A collaborative robot system according to the present invention includes a retreat controller including circuitry that causes multiple robots to perform a retreat operation, and the retreat controller, during a standby mode, when an external force is applied to one robot, causes the robot to retreat and also causes another robot adjacent to the retreated robot to perform a separation operation in a direction opposite to a direction of a movement of the retreated robot.