Cobotic Assembly Imaging for Human-Induced Change Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In cobotic manufacturing processes where humans and robots collaborate, manual condition-of-assembly checks are time-consuming and prone to human error, leading to quality non-conformance due to evolving work environments and structures.

Innovation Solution

A robotic manufacturing system equipped with a presence sensor and imaging device that detects human presence, acquires images of the workpiece, and compares them to reference data to ensure conformity, updating the control plan and digital twin to reflect human-induced changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual condition-of-assembly checks are performed by human operators, then quality conformance can be verified, but the process becomes time-consuming and prone to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality conformanceVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated imaging system that captures images of the workpiece and compares them against reference data. The control unit automatically detects deviations and updates the digital twin, eliminating the need for human operators to manually walk around and compare assembly status against engineering drawings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and maintains a digital twin (virtual copy) of the workpiece that is continuously updated based on imaging data. This digital replica allows for automatic comparison between the actual workpiece state and the expected state, enabling rapid quality verification without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If human operators work together with robots in a cobotic process, then manufacturing flexibility and adaptability improve, but quality non-conformance increases due to evolving work environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecobotic collaborationVSAvoidquality conformance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the workpiece using imaging devices and provides feedback to the control unit. When deviations are detected, the control unit updates the digital twin and can adjust the robot's control plan in real-time, ensuring that the robotic operations adapt to the actual workpiece state while maintaining quality standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The digital twin and control plan are not static but dynamically updated based on real-time imaging data. This allows the system to adapt to changes in the workpiece state caused by human operators or environmental factors, maintaining reliability in a flexible cobotic environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If the robot operates autonomously according to a fixed control plan, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but the system cannot adapt to human-induced changes in the workpiece

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobotic operation accuracyVSAvoidresponse to human intervention
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-verification by automatically comparing imaging data against the digital twin and control plan. When deviations are detected, the system self-corrects by updating the digital twin and adjusting the control plan, enabling autonomous adaptation without human intervention while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If continuous imaging is performed to monitor workpiece changes, then quality detection capability improves, but system complexity and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange detection accuracyVSAvoidimaging and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous imaging, the system performs periodic imaging at key stages of the manufacturing process or when triggered by specific events (such as human presence detection). This reduces the imaging and processing load while maintaining adequate quality monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures quality conformance by pausing operations when human intervention occurs, updating the control plan to account for changes, thereby reducing errors and improving manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A presence sensor is configured to detect presence of a human within the working area

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPresence detection:

Implementation Method 2

An imaging device is configured to acquire an image of at least a portion of the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImage capture: Photography

Data Source

PatentEP4035846B1Robotic manufacturing systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.09.24 THE BOEING CO
  • EP4035846B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4035846B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP4035846B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

A robotic manufacturing system (100) and method include a robot (102) including a control unit (108) in communication with an operative member (110). The control unit (108) is configured to operate the operative member (110) in relation to a workpiece (104) within a working area (106) according to a control plan (114). A presence sensor (118) is configured to detect presence of a human within the working area (106). An imaging device (120) is configured to acquire an image (122) of at least a portion of the workpiece (104) in response to the presence sensor (118) detecting the presence of the human within the working area (106).