Cochlear Implant Electrode Selection via Current Spread Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional hearing aids and prostheses face challenges in optimizing electrode performance in cochlear implants, leading to inefficient sound perception for individuals with conductive or sensorineural hearing loss, as they rely on air conduction or electrical stimulation without effective methods to evaluate and adjust electrode interactions for improved auditory nerve stimulation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that evaluates interactions between current spreads or neural spreads of multiple electrodes implanted in a recipient, allowing for the disabling or deactivation of specific electrodes based on these evaluations, using a fitting system to configure the hearing prosthesis for enhanced sound processing and perception.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple electrodes are implanted in a recipient to provide comprehensive auditory stimulation, then the hearing prosthesis can cover a broader range of auditory perception, but the complexity of evaluating and managing electrode interactions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauditory perception rangeVSAvoidelectrode evaluation and management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically evaluates current spreads and neural spreads from multiple electrodes by delivering test signals and measuring responses. Based on this feedback, the system determines which electrodes to disable, creating a closed-loop optimization process that manages electrode complexity while maintaining comprehensive auditory coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The hearing prosthesis performs self-evaluation of electrode performance by automatically delivering test signals, measuring neural responses, and determining optimal electrode configurations without requiring manual clinician adjustment for each electrode interaction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If all electrodes are enabled to maximize auditory stimulation, then comprehensive sound perception is achieved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound perception completenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of enabling all electrodes, the system selectively disables specific electrodes based on evaluated current spreads and neural spreads. This partial action approach maintains sufficient auditory stimulation while reducing energy consumption by keeping only the necessary electrodes active

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Use of energy by moving object

If electrodes are selectively disabled to reduce energy consumption, then battery life is extended, but the risk of suboptimal auditory perception increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidauditory perception quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from neural spread measurements to verify that disabled electrodes are indeed unnecessary for optimal auditory perception. This feedback loop ensures that energy savings are achieved without compromising hearing quality, as the remaining enabled electrodes are confirmed to provide sufficient stimulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Before permanently disabling electrodes, the system performs preliminary evaluations by delivering test signals and measuring neural responses to determine which electrodes can be safely disabled. This preliminary action ensures that only non-essential electrodes are disabled, maintaining auditory perception quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If manual evaluation and adjustment of electrode settings is performed by a clinician, then customized fitting is achieved, but the process time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode fitting customizationVSAvoidfitting process time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The hearing prosthesis performs self-evaluation of electrode performance by automatically delivering test signals, measuring neural responses, and determining optimal electrode configurations without requiring manual clinician adjustment for each electrode interaction, significantly reducing fitting time while maintaining customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical evaluation processes with automated electronic measurement and signal processing. Electrical test signals are delivered through electrodes, and neural responses are measured and processed by a processor to automatically determine electrode settings, eliminating time-consuming manual adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables a more precise configuration of cochlear implants by identifying and disabling underperforming electrodes, resulting in improved sound perception and reduced energy consumption, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the hearing prosthesis.

Implementation Method 1

certain types of hearing prostheses commonly referred to as cochlear implants convert a received sound into electrical stimulation. The electrical stimulation is applied to the cochlea, which results in the perception of the received sound.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical stimulation: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

evaluating least one of interactions of respective current spreads with one another or interactions of respective neural spreads with one another for a plurality of electrodes implanted in a recipient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNeural spread interaction: Electric Field

Data Source

PatentUS10537739B2Electrode selection
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 COCHLEAR LIMITED
  • US10537739B2 patent drawing
  • US10537739B2 patent drawing
  • US10537739B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, including the action of executing a first evaluation including evaluating first interactions of respective current spreads with one another for a plurality of first electrodes implanted in a recipient resulting from energizement thereof with at least one second implanted electrode disabled, wherein the second electrode, if enabled and energized at about the same level as at least one of the first electrodes, would result in current spread to at least one of the plurality of first electrodes, and one of disabling at least one third electrode of the plurality of first electrodes based on the evaluation or maintaining an enablement of the nondisabled electrodes based on the evaluation.