Cochlear Implant Parameter Reduction via Dimensionality Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Configuring complex medical devices like cochlear implants with numerous parameters is time-consuming and complex due to the large number of possible parameter combinations and interactions, making it difficult to determine optimal settings for individual recipients.

Innovation Solution

A method that reduces the number of input variables by evaluating the behavior of the device over a predetermined selection of parameter values and deriving new, simpler parameters using dimensionality reduction algorithms, allowing for configuration with fewer variables.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a large number of parameters are used to configure the cochlear implant, then the system can achieve precise control over sound perception, but the configuration process becomes time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound perception precisionVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the configuration process into two distinct phases: (1) an automated initial fitting phase that quickly establishes a baseline configuration using a reduced parameter set, and (2) a subsequent fine-tuning phase that adjusts specific parameters based on recipient feedback. This segmentation allows the system to achieve precise sound perception control while significantly reducing the overall configuration time by handling the bulk of parameter optimization automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the configuration approach by changing from manually adjusting all individual parameters to using an automated algorithm that derives optimal parameter values through mathematical optimization. The system changes the state of multiple parameters simultaneously based on objective measurements and recipient responses, rather than requiring sequential manual adjustment of each parameter, thereby reducing configuration time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If many parameters with wide ranges are configured, then the system can accommodate individual recipient variations, but the number of possible parameter combinations increases dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecipient adaptationVSAvoidparameter combination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback-driven configuration system where the algorithm iteratively adjusts parameters based on objective measurements (such as speech reception thresholds) and subjective recipient feedback. This feedback loop allows the system to efficiently navigate the large parameter space by eliminating suboptimal combinations early and focusing adjustments on the most impactful parameters, thereby maintaining high adaptability while reducing the effective complexity of the configuration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the automated algorithm perform initial parameter optimization before recipient fine-tuning. The system pre-calculates optimal parameter values based on objective test results, establishing a well-founded starting point that reduces the subsequent adjustment burden. This preliminary configuration handles the complex parameter interactions in advance, leaving only minor adaptations needed for individual recipient preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple parameters are adjusted simultaneously, then the system can achieve comprehensive optimization, but it becomes difficult to determine the impact of individual parameter changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem optimizationVSAvoidparameter impact analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic configuration approach where the algorithm adaptively determines which parameters to adjust at each step based on current system state and optimization progress. Rather than simultaneously adjusting all parameters, the system dynamically selects and adjusts only the most impactful parameters at each iteration, making the optimization process manageable and interpretable while still achieving comprehensive system optimization over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by having the automated algorithm focus on optimizing only the most critical parameters that have the greatest impact on sound perception, rather than attempting to simultaneously optimize all parameters. This selective approach allows the system to achieve reliable optimization of the key performance drivers while avoiding the complexity of analyzing every parameter's individual impact, with less critical parameters being adjusted subsequently based on recipient feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8838250B2Configuring a hearing prosthesis with a reduced quantity of parameters
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 COCHLEAR LIMITED
  • US8838250B2 patent drawing
  • US8838250B2 patent drawing
  • US8838250B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a first set of one or more parameters for configuring a system, the method including evaluating a behavior of the system over a predetermined selection of parameter values for a second set of parameters, and deriving a first set of one or more parameters to configure the system based on the evaluated behavior of the system, wherein the number of parameters in the first set is less than the number of parameters in the second set.