Vehicle Cockpit Auto-Adjustment Using Full Driver Anthropometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for adjusting a vehicle cockpit based on driver anthropometry are inadequate, as they rely solely on height measurements, failing to account for variations in torso, leg, neck, and arm lengths, leading to uncertain seating positions and comfort issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilizes anthropometric data, including limb lengths and joint positions, to calculate an ergonomic position for the driver, adjusting seat, steering wheel, and rear-view mirrors using actuators, with sensors detecting driver features and preferences to achieve optimal cockpit configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If only driver height is measured to calculate comfort position, then the system is simple to implement, but the seating position accuracy becomes uncertain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidseating position accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the anthropometric measurement into multiple independent parameters (height, torso length, leg length, arm length, neck length) rather than relying on a single height measurement. Each parameter is measured separately to provide comprehensive data for accurate seat positioning calculation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional height measurement to multi-dimensional anthropometric assessment by incorporating additional body dimension measurements (torso, legs, arms, neck). This dimensional expansion enables precise calculation of ergonomic seating position that accounts for individual body proportions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive anthropometric data collection is implemented, then seating position accuracy is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseating position accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs all measurements and calculations without requiring manual input from the driver. Sensors autonomously detect anthropometric parameters, and the control unit automatically processes this data to determine optimal seating position, eliminating the need for manual measurement tools or driver intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual measurement methods with automated sensor-based detection systems. Optical sensors, capacitive sensors, or other detection devices automatically measure body dimensions, substituting mechanical measurement tools and manual procedures with electronic sensing and automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If manual adjustment by driver is required, then system simplicity is maintained, but adjustment time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidadjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automatic adjustment of the seat to the calculated ergonomic position before the driver begins driving. This preliminary positioning eliminates the need for subsequent manual adjustments by the driver, saving time and ensuring optimal positioning from the start.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The seat adjustment system operates autonomously without requiring driver intervention. The control unit automatically controls the seat positioning mechanism based on measured anthropometric data, making the system self-serving and eliminating manual adjustment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of time

If automatic seat adjustment is implemented, then adjustment time is reduced, but the number of components increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadjustment timeVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit serves multiple functions: it processes anthropometric measurement data, calculates ergonomic seating position, and controls seat positioning mechanisms. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be separate components into a single integrated control system, reducing overall component count despite the automated capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12454203B2Method for the automatic adjustment of a cockpit inside a road vehicle and relative road vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.10.28 FERRARI SPA
  • US12454203B2 patent drawing
  • US12454203B2 patent drawing
  • US12454203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the automatic adjustment of a cockpit inside a road vehicle comprising the steps of determining anthropometric data of a driver; processing an ergonomic position of a model of the driver sitting on board the road vehicle; processing an optimal configuration of the cockpit; operating a plurality of actuator systems so as to cause the cockpit to reach the optimal configuration; wherein the ergonomic position of the model is processed in association with a minimum ground visibility; a minimum visibility of a control panel; and at least one first comfort angle of a body joint of the driver.