Code Analysis System Traverses Codebase to Eliminate Redundant Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Code redundancy in development environments leads to increased lines of code, difficulty in tracking existing code, and wastage of resources, as developers often recreate existing code without knowledge of previously developed modules, due to the lack of effective tracking mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that traverses a codebase to identify and collect modules, functions, and code patterns, allowing developers to check if existing code matches their requirements, thereby reducing redundant code development by implementing existing code and adding new code to the codebase as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If developers write code from scratch without tracking existing code, then new features can be implemented quickly, but redundant code is created increasing codebase size and maintenance difficulty

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment speedVSAvoidcodebase size
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically scanning and indexing the entire codebase before the developer writes any code. Module definitions, functions, and code patterns are pre-collected and stored in a searchable database, enabling developers to quickly check for existing code through simple queries rather than writing from scratch

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary system (code analysis tool) is introduced between the developer and the codebase. This intermediary automatically traverses the codebase, collects module information, and presents it to developers, eliminating the need for developers to manually search through existing code while preventing redundant code creation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Quantity of substance

If developers manually track existing code modules, then code redundancy can be reduced, but time and resources are wasted on tracking instead of development

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode redundancyVSAvoidtime for code tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically performing the code tracking function without requiring developer involvement. The code analysis tool autonomously traverses the codebase, collects module definitions, and maintains an updated index, allowing developers to focus solely on development activities while the system handles tracking independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of developers searching and tracking code is replaced with an automated computational system. The code analysis tool uses algorithms to traverse, parse, and index the codebase automatically, substituting human effort with machine-based code analysis and information retrieval

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If new developers assume all assigned features are new, then they can start working immediately, but they recreate existing code increasing development time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of starting workVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-analyzing and indexing all existing code modules before new developers start work. When a developer queries for a feature, the system immediately checks the pre-built index and returns matching modules, allowing developers to quickly determine whether to implement existing code or create new functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback to developers by querying the codebase and returning information about existing modules that match their requirements. This feedback mechanism informs developers whether their assigned feature already exists in the codebase, preventing unnecessary recreation of existing code while maintaining ease of starting work

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11886849B2System and method to compare modules for the common code, remove the redundancy and run the unique workflows
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 DELL PROD LP
  • US11886849B2 patent drawing
  • US11886849B2 patent drawing
  • US11886849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes receiving a code request, parsing code associated with the code request, storing, in a staging database, a portion of the code, traversing a codebase to identify any code in the codebase that matches the portion of the code, and when code is found in the codebase that matches the portion of the code, incrementing a green count and pushing the portion of the code to a redundant code bin, and when no code is found in the codebase that matches the portion of the code, incrementing a red counter and updating the codebase to include the portion of the code.