Code Notebook Semantic Querying for Complex Program Flow Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing code analysis tools require precise constraints and are limited to expert users, failing to provide semantic and structural searching capabilities, making it difficult for non-experts to efficiently navigate and understand complex software code.

Innovation Solution

A code notebook that utilizes machine learning to enable semantic, structural, and programming-flow queries, allowing users to submit fuzzy code queries that are expanded to include semantically equivalent terms and structural constraints, with a cloud-based database to analyze and store program source code.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional search tools are used to search for code, then the search can be performed quickly, but the user must know exactly what to look for (exact variable, type, or routine names)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch precisionVSAvoidease of code searching
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (code analysis tool with AI capabilities) that translates natural language queries into precise code searches. This mediator bridges the gap between user intent and exact code matching, allowing users to search using descriptive language rather than requiring knowledge of specific variable or function names.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of search input from requiring exact technical terms (variable names, function names) to accepting natural language descriptions. This parameter transformation allows users with domain knowledge but limited programming expertise to perform effective code searches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If experts spend time learning cutting-edge coding techniques, then they can implement sophisticated software concepts, but this comes at an opportunity cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to implement sophisticated conceptsVSAvoidtime for learning programming
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables experts to leverage sophisticated code implementation capabilities without personally learning the programming details. The AI-powered code analysis and generation tools perform the technical work, allowing domain experts to focus on their core expertise while the system handles the coding implementation automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If code is written by multiple developers with different styles, then the software can be developed collaboratively, but it becomes complex to search and navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaborative developmentVSAvoidcode structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the complexity of diverse code structures into a unified searchable representation. By analyzing semantic meaning rather than syntactic form, the tool normalizes different coding styles into comparable parameters, allowing efficient navigation across multi-developer codebases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If exact search terms are required for code queries, then precise results can be obtained, but non-expert users cannot effectively search for code

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch result accuracyVSAvoidease of code querying
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an intermediary AI system that translates imprecise natural language queries into precise code search operations. This intermediary layer maintains search accuracy by understanding the intent behind vague queries and mapping them to the appropriate code elements, while presenting a simple interface to non-expert users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260003580A1Notebook for navigating code using machine learning and flow analysis
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20260003580A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003580A1 patent drawing
  • US20260003580A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A code notebook and backend cloud service are configured to intelligently analyze program source code that a developer wants analyzed. A user drafts a code query to be answered about the source code that may specify specific variables, code structure elements, and/or program flows to be scrutinized. A cloud-computing environment builds a code database of the source code and analyzes its text, code structures, and program flows using. The code database is embedded with indications of semantic equivalences for text in the source code, identifications of different code structural elements, and program flows. In the cloud-computing environment, a query service takes the code query of the developer and queries the database with the machine-learned embeddings, generating query results that are shared with the developer and shown in a representation of the source code.