Program Code Simafication for Redundant Instruction Elimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer programs in dynamic languages often contain redundant or inefficient instructions due to their dynamic nature, leading to suboptimal execution performance.

Innovation Solution

A system analyzes computer programs to identify instructions that yield the same results and replaces them with optimized sets of instructions, reducing the number of operations required.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dynamic language code is executed as-is, then program adaptability is maintained, but execution performance deteriorates due to redundant instructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution performanceVSAvoidinstruction redundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis and evaluation of the dynamic language code before execution, identifying redundant instructions and generating optimized code in advance. This preliminary processing transforms the code into a more efficient form that executes faster while maintaining the same functional behavior, thereby resolving the contradiction between execution performance and instruction redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the original dynamic language code and processes this copy to generate optimized instructions. By working with a copy rather than modifying the original, the system preserves the adaptability of the dynamic language while producing an optimized version that eliminates redundant instructions, thus improving execution performance without losing programming flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Speed

If code is analyzed and optimized by replacing instructions, then computational speed is improved, but code complexity increases during processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization process is divided into discrete segments: code analysis phase, instruction evaluation phase, optimization generation phase, and code replacement phase. By segmenting the complex optimization task into manageable steps, the system can process code efficiently and systematically, improving computational speed while keeping the processing complexity organized and controllable through structured methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the optimized code is evaluated against the original to ensure equivalent functionality. This feedback loop allows the system to verify that speed improvements are achieved without introducing errors, managing the complexity of the optimization process through iterative verification and adjustment of the generated instructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If redundant instructions are removed, then execution time is reduced, but code maintainability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution timeVSAvoidcode maintainability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of code density by transforming redundant instructions into condensed, optimized instructions that achieve the same functionality with fewer operations. This parameter transformation reduces execution time while maintaining code clarity through systematic optimization rules that preserve logical structure, thereby reducing execution time without significantly impacting maintainability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250362893A1Simafication of computer program code
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 MANYCORE CORP
  • US20250362893A1 patent drawing
  • US20250362893A1 patent drawing
  • US20250362893A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems describe providing for simafication of machine computer code. The system received a computer program for evaluation and determining a plurality of occurrences of sets of instructions in the code of the computer program that will reproduce the same computed results when the code is executed. For each determined plurality of occurrences of the instructions the system computes the results of the instructions and the system generates a new set of instructions describing the computed results. The system updates the received computer by replacing the occurrences of the instructions in the code with the generated new set of instructions describing the computed results.