Codebook Compression Evaluation Without Test Codebook Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current codebook generation systems are computationally intensive, leading to significant waste and inefficiency, as they generate multiple codebooks that are mostly discarded, and struggle with the trade-off between codebook size and coverage, making them impractical for resource-constrained environments.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine compression performance without generating test codebooks, using collected symbol occurrences to calculate a compaction factor, enabling efficient codebook optimization and real-time performance tracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple codebooks are generated for different sourceblock lengths through test encoding operations, then compression performance can be evaluated and optimized, but computational complexity increases by orders of magnitude and most generated codebooks are discarded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression performance evaluationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential performance evaluation metric (compaction factor) from the complex codebook generation and testing process. By calculating the compaction factor directly from symbol occurrence probabilities without generating actual codebooks, the system obtains compression performance measurements while eliminating the computational overhead of generating and testing multiple codebooks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified mathematical model (compaction factor calculation) that copies the essential performance characteristics of actual codebook compression without requiring the full codebook generation process. This mathematical copy allows performance evaluation with minimal computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive codebooks are created to encode all possible sourceblocks, then coverage is improved, but codebook size becomes prohibitively large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesourceblock coverageVSAvoidcodebook size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being measured from codebook size to compaction factor, which can be calculated from occurrence probabilities. This allows evaluation of compression performance for different codebook configurations without actually creating the codebooks, thus avoiding the trade-off between coverage and size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calculation of occurrence probabilities and compaction factors before codebook generation. This allows the system to determine the optimal codebook configuration in advance based on statistical analysis, avoiding the need to create and store multiple large codebooks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If traditional codebook generation methods are used, then compression performance can be optimized, but significant computational waste occurs as most generated codebooks are discarded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression optimization efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the necessary performance metric (compaction factor) from the codebook generation process, calculating it directly from occurrence statistics without generating the actual codebooks. This eliminates computational waste while maintaining the ability to evaluate and optimize compression performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the occurrence statistics collected during normal operation to self-evaluate compression performance and determine optimal codebook configuration, eliminating the need for separate, computationally intensive codebook generation and testing phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250271992A1System and Method for Determining Compression Performance of Codebooks Without Generation
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 ATOMBEAM TECH INC
  • US20250271992A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271992A1 patent drawing
  • US20250271992A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for determining compression performance of codebooks based on collected symbol occurrences without issuing a codebook. The method analyzes sourceblock frequency distributions and calculates a compaction factor using the sum of squared probabilities. By calculating K=−log2(Q)/(n*8), where Q represents the sum of squared probabilities and n is the sourceblock length in bytes, the system accurately predicts compression performance without generating test codebooks. This approach enables efficient codebook optimization by directly calculating performance metrics from occurrence statistics, eliminating the computational overhead of traditional methods that require generating and testing multiple codebooks. The system provides significant benefits for resource-constrained environments and real-time applications, enabling sophisticated compression optimization with minimal computational requirements and allowing performance tracking as data patterns evolve over time.