Codon-optimized polynucleotides for modulating immune response strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for expressing foreign genes in host cells face challenges due to mismatched codon usage patterns, leading to inefficient translation and immune response modulation, as different cell types within an organism have distinct codon usage biases that cannot be predicted by organism-wide averages.

Innovation Solution

The development of a method to rank and replace codons in antigen-encoding polynucleotides with synonymous codons that have higher or lower immune response preferences, as determined experimentally, to optimize immune response quality in mammals, using tables to select codons that enhance or reduce immune response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If codon composition of antigen-encoding polynucleotide is optimized for host cell translation efficiency, then translation efficiency is improved, but immune response quality is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation efficiencyVSAvoidimmune response quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating codon optimization strategies for different functional regions of the antigen protein. Critical antigenic epitopes use wild-type or immunogenic codons to maintain immune recognition, while non-critical regions use host-preferred codons to enhance translation efficiency. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction between translation efficiency and immune response quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by not uniformly optimizing all codons for host preference. Instead, it deliberately retains or introduces rare codons at specific positions to enhance immune recognition. This inversion strategy challenges the assumption that host-preferred codons are always superior, resolving the contradiction by showing that rare codons can be beneficial for immune response quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of manufacture

If organism-wide average codon usage is used for gene expression optimization, then ease of manufacture is improved, but translation efficiency in specific cell types is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegene expression optimizationVSAvoidtranslation efficiency in specific cell types
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the codon optimization process into cell-type-specific strategies. Instead of using a single organism-wide average, it identifies and applies distinct codon usage patterns for different cell types (e.g., dendritic cells, macrophages, B cells). This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling tailored optimization for each cell type's translation machinery while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through systematic approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of codon usage from a fixed organism-wide average to dynamic cell-type-specific values. By adjusting codon preferences based on the specific cell type's tRNA abundance and translation kinetics, the patent achieves both ease of manufacture through systematic optimization and high translation efficiency in target cell types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If rare codons are present in antigen-encoding polynucleotide, then immune response quality is enhanced, but translation efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response qualityVSAvoidtranslation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically placing rare codons only at specific positions within the antigen sequence, particularly in regions containing critical epitopes. This localized use of rare codons enhances immune recognition where needed while minimizing the overall impact on translation efficiency. The rare codons are not distributed uniformly but are precisely positioned to maximize immunogenicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by using rare codons selectively rather than extensively throughout the entire antigen sequence. Only specific codons at strategically important positions are optimized for immune recognition, while the majority of codons use host-preferred variants to maintain efficient translation. This partial application resolves the contradiction by balancing immune enhancement with translation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9795658B2Expression system for modulating an immune response
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 JINGANG MEDICINE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
  • US9795658B2 patent drawing
  • US9795658B2 patent drawing
  • US9795658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses methods and compositions for modulating the quality of an immune response to a target antigen in a mammal, which response results from the expression of a polynucleotide that encodes at least a portion of the target antigen, wherein the quality is modulated by replacing at least one codon of the polynucleotide with a synonymous codon that has a higher or lower preference of usage by the mammal to confer the immune response than the codon it replaces.