Coffee bean grinding machine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing coffee beverage production devices lack a configuration for grinding coffee beans that allows for varied particle sizes and flavors, limiting user experience and convenience.

Innovation Solution

A coffee bean grinding machine with multiple grinder types and a control device that adjusts particle sizes based on user input or order information, enabling production of ground coffee beans with varied flavors and particle sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a coffee beverage production device uses a fixed grinder configuration, then the device structure is simple, but the particle size variety and flavor customization are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticle size varietyVSAvoidgrinder configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinder is designed with adjustable particle size settings that can be dynamically changed during operation. The control device enables switching between multiple particle size types (first, second, and third particle sizes), allowing the system to adapt to different coffee brewing requirements without requiring multiple fixed grinder units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters of the grinder by implementing multiple particle size settings. The control device manages different particle size configurations, enabling the same grinder to produce varied ground coffee particle sizes, thereby improving versatility without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the grinder produces multiple particle sizes simultaneously, then flavor variety is improved, but the grinding process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflavor varietyVSAvoidgrinding process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding process is segmented into different particle size categories (first, second, and third particle sizes). The control device manages these segmented outputs, allowing different particle sizes to be produced either simultaneously or sequentially based on selected patterns, thereby achieving flavor variety while maintaining manageable process complexity through structured segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control device implements periodic action by allowing sequential switching between different particle size production modes. Different particle sizes can be produced in a controlled sequence or in specific patterns over time, enabling flavor variety without requiring all particle sizes to be produced simultaneously, thus managing grinding process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Ease of operation

If the control device offers multiple particle size patterns, then user preference matching is improved, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser preference matchingVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device implements preliminary action by pre-configuring multiple particle size patterns that can be selected based on user preferences or order information. These patterns are prepared in advance, allowing users to simply select from predefined options rather than manually configuring each parameter, thereby improving ease of operation while managing control system complexity through pre-programmed solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device enables self-service operation by automatically managing the complex particle size selection and grinding process based on user input or order information. Once the user selects a desired pattern or specifies order requirements, the control system autonomously handles the coordination of multiple particle size productions, reducing the operational burden on the user while maintaining sophisticated control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If the machine receives order information via network, then ordering convenience is improved, but the system integration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveordering convenienceVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device acts as an intermediary between the network ordering system and the grinder. It receives order information containing particle size distribution requirements via network communication, processes this information, and translates it into appropriate grinding operations. This intermediary role simplifies the interface for users while managing the complexity of system integration behind the scenes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12433449B2Coffee bean grinding machine
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 DAITO ENTERTAINMENT INC
  • US12433449B2 patent drawing
  • US12433449B2 patent drawing
  • US12433449B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A coffee bean grinding machine with which a taste of coffee can be enjoyed. A coffee bean grinding machine including: a grinder configured to grind coffee beans; and a control device configured to control the grinder, in which the grinder has a plurality of types of particle sizes that can be set for producing ground coffee beans, and the control device controls the production of the ground coffee beans while changing the set particle size of the grinder according to the plurality of set particle sizes.