Cognitive Assistant Hierarchy Scoring for Social Boundary Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cognitive digital assistant systems lack emotional intelligence, which limits their ability to effectively navigate complex social environments and manage interactions among participants with varying hierarchy levels.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating hierarchy knowledge into cognitive digital assistant systems by identifying participants, determining hierarchy scores based on profile information and interaction data, and adjusting interactions and communications to maintain appropriate boundary conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cognitive digital assistant systems use basic AI and machine learning algorithms, then they can perform simple tasks and predict user needs, but they lack emotional intelligence to navigate complex social environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to navigate social environmentsVSAvoidemotional intelligence
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cognitive assistant's interaction capabilities into distinct hierarchy levels. It identifies and processes multiple participants in a conversation, determining their relative hierarchy positions separately. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex social dynamics by breaking down the social environment into manageable hierarchical relationships, enabling emotional intelligence without overwhelming the basic AI framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a hierarchical dimension to the existing AI system. By introducing hierarchy scores and boundary condition analysis as an additional layer beyond basic task prediction, the system gains emotional intelligence capabilities. This dimensional addition allows the assistant to understand not just what users need, but also the social context and appropriate interaction boundaries, resolving the contradiction between basic functionality and emotional sophistication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the cognitive digital assistant monitors and analyzes communications to identify boundary conditions, then it can maintain appropriate interaction boundaries, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary condition managementVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing boundary conditions based on hierarchy scores before interactions occur. The system determines hierarchical relationships and sets appropriate boundaries in advance, rather than analyzing every interaction in real-time. This preliminary structuring reduces the computational complexity during actual interactions while maintaining reliable boundary management, as the heavy analytical work is done beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the cognitive assistant continuously monitors communications and adjusts its understanding of hierarchy and boundaries based on observed interactions. This feedback loop allows the system to refine its boundary condition management dynamically, improving reliability while managing complexity through adaptive learning rather than rigid predefined rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10607612B2Hierarchical intimacy for cognitive assistants
Publication Date: 2020.03.31 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10607612B2 patent drawing
  • US10607612B2 patent drawing
  • US10607612B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method executed by a cognitive system for incorporating hierarchy knowledge. In one embodiment, the computer-implemented method includes the steps of identifying one or more participants during an interaction; obtaining profile information for each of the participants; determining a hierarchy score for each of the participants based on a plurality of factors using the profile information for each of the participants; monitoring and analyzing communications between the participants during the interaction to identify boundary conditions based on the hierarchy score; and interacting with one or more the participants in a manner consistent with the hierarchy score of the participants.