Cognitive Bias Detection in Self-Reported Data Using Predictive Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to effectively detect and correct cognitive biases in self-reported data, which can lead to inaccurate analysis and interpretation of physiological and psychological data.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for detecting and correcting cognitive biases in self-reported data by generating an ontology of bias descriptor features, using predictive models to evaluate and adjust data, and recommending changes to device, application, or study design to mitigate biases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If self-reported data is collected from users, then data quantity and ease of collection are improved, but cognitive biases are introduced that reduce data reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection efficiencyVSAvoiddata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system comprising predictive models and bias descriptor features that mediate between the self-reported data and the final analysis. This intermediary layer detects and corrects cognitive biases without eliminating the self-reporting mechanism, thus preserving data collection efficiency while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using predictive models to generate expected values and comparing them with actual self-reported data. The bias descriptor features provide feedback signals that identify deviations caused by cognitive biases, enabling corrective adjustments to the data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If predictive models are used to detect cognitive biases, then data reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by introducing bias descriptor features that characterize different types of cognitive biases. These features transform the analysis from raw data comparison to a structured evaluation based on predefined bias characteristics, making the complexity more manageable and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the bias detection process into distinct components: predictive models generate expectations, bias descriptor features identify specific bias types, and correction mechanisms address individual bias instances. This segmentation reduces overall system complexity by breaking down the complex task into manageable modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12411750B2Cognitive bias detection and correction in self-reported data
Publication Date: 2025.09.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12411750B2 patent drawing
  • US12411750B2 patent drawing
  • US12411750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are provided for cognitive bias detection and correction in self-reported data. In some embodiments, a system can include a processor that executes computer-executable components stored in memory. The computer-executable components include first components that creates an ontology of bias descriptor features to identify cognitive biases. The cognitive biases can include a combination of at least one device-induced cognitive bias, at least one testing-application-induced cognitive bias, or at least one study-design-induced cognitive bias.