Cognitive CAD System Automating Topology Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current CAD systems require manual re-modeling and iterative design processes, even with advanced topology optimization tools, as they are based on traditional subtractive manufacturing processes, necessitating user intervention to validate mechanical properties and performance.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive design system that uses a graphical user interface to receive user inputs on material selection, load conditions, and constraints, and iteratively optimizes material distribution within a CAD model to generate an optimized design suitable for specified manufacturing processes, reducing user burden and automating the design process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If topology optimization tools are used to provide suggestions on best geometries, then design quality is improved, but manual re-modelling by user is still required which increases device complexity and time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidmanual re-modelling requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic re-modelling without user intervention. The computer system executes optimization routines that automatically generate final design models based on topology optimization suggestions, eliminating the need for manual re-modelling by the user while maintaining high design quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of user re-modelling is replaced by an automated computational system. The computer system uses algorithms and software routines to automatically transform topology optimization suggestions into final design models, substituting human manual operations with automated mechanical/computational processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If traditional subtractive manufacturing-based CAD tools are used, then ease of operation is maintained, but automation extent is limited requiring user intervention for validation and iteration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface simplicityVSAvoiduser intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs validation and iterative optimization without requiring user intervention. The computer system executes routines that validate mechanical properties and performance automatically, and iteratively optimizes the design based on specified criteria, making the system self-sufficient rather than requiring continuous user input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where optimization results are validated against specified criteria, and subsequent iterations are automatically performed based on the validation outcomes. This closed-loop feedback system eliminates the need for manual validation cycles while maintaining ease of operation through a simple graphical interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If manual design iteration is performed to validate mechanical properties, then design reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to repetitive user actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical properties validationVSAvoiditeration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Manual validation actions are replaced by automated computational routines. The computer system automatically validates mechanical properties and performance using FEA algorithms and optimization routines, substituting the time-consuming manual iteration process with fast automated computational validation that maintains or improves reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation and optimization process continues automatically without interruption. Instead of stopping for manual user actions at each iteration step, the system performs continuous automated validation and optimization cycles, maintaining the useful action of design improvement without the breaks and delays caused by manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS11003805B2Cognitive system for computer aided design
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 CARBON INC
  • US11003805B2 patent drawing
  • US11003805B2 patent drawing
  • US11003805B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-aided design (CAD) model of an article for manufacture, together with user problem definition input including materials, constraints, load conditions, preferred manufacturing processes, etc. for an optimized design of the article or material microstructure are received via a prompt-and-response graphical user interface. Based on this information, one or more routines to iteratively optimize material distribution within said article or the material microstructure design are executed in order to achieve best performance for materials, loads, and constraints specified by the user. At the completion of the optimization process, the user is presented the optimized design in a CAD file describing the optimized design of the article for the preferred manufacturing process or a newly designed material microstructure, as appropriate.