Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis via Eye Movement Distribution Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cognitive impairment diagnostic methods are inefficient, costly, and lack objectivity, requiring skilled examiners and significant time, while also being language-dependent, making them unsuitable for widespread and timely diagnosis, especially in elderly populations.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive impairment diagnostic apparatus and program that uses a display to show videos, captures eye images, detects viewpoints, creates distribution maps, and diagnoses based on characteristic data, allowing for objective, quantitative, and language-independent assessment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional neuropsychological test methods (e.g., MMSE) are used for cognitive impairment diagnosis, then diagnostic accuracy can be achieved, but diagnostic time becomes excessively long (30 minutes or more) and requires skilled examiners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual neuropsychological testing process with an automated eye movement detection system. Instead of using traditional methods that require examiner interaction and manual assessment, the system uses imaging cameras to automatically capture and analyze eye movement data, substituting the mechanical testing process with an automated optical detection system that delivers results in seconds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The diagnostic system performs self-assessment through automated eye movement analysis without requiring skilled examiners. The imaging cameras and processing algorithms independently conduct the diagnosis by automatically detecting eye movement patterns and comparing them against established criteria, eliminating the need for human examiner intervention while maintaining diagnostic accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional diagnostic methods are used, then comprehensive assessment can be performed, but the system becomes language-dependent and requires trained examiners, reducing versatility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage independenceVSAvoidexaminer skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces language-based communication and examiner judgment with automated eye movement detection. By capturing ocular data through imaging cameras and analyzing movement patterns algorithmically, the system eliminates dependency on language comprehension and examiner interpretation skills, enabling universal application across different linguistic and cultural contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If traditional diagnostic approaches are used, then thorough evaluation is possible, but cost and complexity of the diagnostic apparatus increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic objectivityVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual diagnostic procedures with a simplified automated system using standard imaging cameras. Instead of requiring multiple specialized tools and examiner expertise, the system uses readily available imaging technology combined with automated analysis algorithms to achieve objective diagnostic results, reducing both apparatus complexity and operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If conventional testing methods are employed, then detailed cognitive assessment can be achieved, but the process becomes expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic efficiencyVSAvoiddiagnostic time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automated self-diagnosis through eye movement analysis without requiring time-consuming human examiner involvement. The imaging cameras continuously capture eye movement data, and the processing system automatically analyzes patterns and generates diagnostic results in seconds, dramatically improving diagnostic throughput and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces time-intensive manual assessment with automated optical detection and algorithmic analysis. By substituting the mechanical process of examiner questioning and observation with rapid eye movement capture and computational analysis, the system achieves diagnostic results in seconds rather than minutes or hours

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3711680B1Cognitive dysfunction diagnostic apparatus and cognitive dysfunction diagnostic program
Publication Date: 2025.01.01 OSAKA UNIVERSITY
  • EP3711680B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3711680B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3711680B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A cognitive impairment diagnostic apparatus (1) includes: a display (10) which displays a video for diagnosis of cognitive impairment on a display surface (11); an imaging unit (21) which captures images of an eye of a subject; a detection unit (37) which detects viewpoints of the subject on the display surface (11) in time series based on the images captured by the imaging unit (21); a creation unit (38) which creates a distribution map representing a distribution of the viewpoints detected by the detection unit (37); a storage unit (32) which stores case characteristic data (310) indicating a characteristic of a viewpoint distribution corresponding to a typical case in cognitive impairment; and a diagnostic unit (39) which diagnoses cognitive impairment of the subject by determining whether the distribution map has the characteristic indicated by the case characteristic data.