Automated Cognitive Distortion Detection via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying and addressing cognitive distortions in cognitive behavioral therapy are time-intensive and require trained therapists to provide feedback, limiting the frequency and immediacy of correction, which hampers effective mental health treatment.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using machine-learned models processes self-reported therapy data via a user interface to classify and provide real-time feedback on cognitive distortions, enabling continuous evaluation and scalable training for patients.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If trained therapists manually evaluate and provide feedback on cognitive distortions, then the quality and accuracy of feedback is improved, but the time consumption and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a computational copy of the therapist's evaluation process by training a machine learning model on therapist annotations of cognitive distortions. The model learns to replicate therapist decision-making patterns and provides feedback that mirrors professional clinical judgment, enabling automated systems to deliver therapist-quality evaluations at scale without manual intervention for each patient interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables patients to receive automated feedback on their own cognitive distortions through self-reported data entry. Patients complete thought records and receive immediate automated evaluation and feedback without requiring therapist time for each interaction. This self-service mechanism allows continuous monitoring and feedback while reducing dependency on therapist availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If therapists provide frequent feedback sessions, then treatment effectiveness is improved, but the resource requirements and therapist workload increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidresource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from periodic therapist feedback sessions to continuous automated evaluation. Patients can submit thought records at any time and receive immediate feedback, creating an uninterrupted feedback loop throughout the treatment process. This continuous action maintains therapeutic momentum and allows for real-time intervention without requiring proportional increases in therapist resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves as a scalable copy of expert therapeutic judgment that can handle unlimited patient interactions simultaneously. Unlike human therapists who have limited capacity, the automated system can provide frequent feedback to multiple patients concurrently without additional resource requirements, enabling high-frequency intervention at low marginal cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If automated systems are used to evaluate cognitive distortions, then scalability and frequency of feedback are improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual therapist evaluation with an automated machine learning-based system. Instead of human cognitive processing for each feedback instance, the system uses computational algorithms trained on therapist data to automatically detect and evaluate cognitive distortions. This substitution enables scaling to large patient populations while maintaining consistent evaluation quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model undergoes extensive preliminary training on annotated therapist data before deployment. This pre-training phase captures expert knowledge and evaluation patterns, allowing the deployed system to function with minimal ongoing configuration or adjustment. The preliminary action of training creates a robust, pre-configured system that can scale without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230282354A1Cognitive Distortion Detection Method and System
Publication Date: 2023.09.07 LIMBIC LTD
  • US20230282354A1 patent drawing
  • US20230282354A1 patent drawing
  • US20230282354A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods that provide for treatment of a cognitive disorder based on self-reporting of cognitive information.