Cognitive Firefighting System Optimizing Water Usage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current firefighting methods rely heavily on water, which is often in limited supply, and the efficiency of water usage is largely dependent on the experience and training of firefighters, impacting fire extinguishing time, property damage, and safety.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive system utilizing machine learning and sensor data to provide expert advice, analyzing real-time data from various sensors and a corpus of firefighting knowledge to generate and score recommendations for improving firefighting efficiency, including water usage, time, and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If vast quantities of water are used to extinguish fires, then the fire can be extinguished, but water supply limitations are exceeded and water efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire extinguishing effectivenessVSAvoidwater consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors fire conditions using sensors and adjusts water application strategies in real-time based on feedback from the fire environment, optimizing water usage while maintaining extinguishing effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cognitive system dynamically changes operational parameters such as water flow rate, pressure, and application timing based on real-time fire assessment, transitioning from static water application to adaptive parameter control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If firefighting efficiency is based on firefighter experience and training, then senior firefighters use water more efficiently, but less experienced firefighters consume more water and take longer to extinguish fires

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater usage efficiencyVSAvoidfire extinguishing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables firefighters to independently access real-time expert recommendations and automated guidance, allowing less experienced firefighters to perform at senior firefighter levels without requiring extensive training or supervision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The cognitive system acts as an intermediary between fire scene data and firefighter actions, providing processed expert knowledge that bridges the experience gap between junior and senior firefighters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If a cognitive system with machine learning and sensor analysis is implemented, then firefighting efficiency is enhanced and water usage is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefirefighting efficiencyVSAvoidcognitive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cognitive system integrates multiple functions including sensor data acquisition, fire condition analysis, recommendation generation, and automated implementation into a single multi-functional platform, reducing the need for separate systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11602656B2Cognitive solution to enhance firefighting capabilities
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 KYNDRYL INC
  • US11602656B2 patent drawing
  • US11602656B2 patent drawing
  • US11602656B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer identifies, based on sensor data from one or more sensors located in proximity to a fire site and on a corpus of firefighting knowledge, one or more firefighting goals. The computer generates, based on the one or more firefighting goals and the corpus of firefighting knowledge, one or more firefighting recommendations. The computer scores, using the corpus of firefighting knowledge, the one or more firefighting recommendations based on historical effectiveness of prior firefighting actions.