Cognitive Load Estimation for Service Agent Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Resource limitations in response management systems lead to inefficiencies in resolving customer-encountered issues, as service agents with varying levels of knowledge and experience are not optimally assigned, resulting in increased time to resolution and escalation of service requests.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates cognitive load for each service request by calculating intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive loads, and assigns service agents based on their hierarchical levels to ensure that requests are handled by agents with the appropriate knowledge and experience, thereby improving resolution efficiency and reducing escalation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If service agents are assigned to resolve service requests without cognitive load estimation, then the assignment process is simple and fast, but the resolution time increases and escalation rate increases due to mismatched agent skills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime to resolutionVSAvoidassignment process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of cognitive load for each service request before assignment. By calculating intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive loads in advance, the system prepares a ranked list of requests that can be efficiently assigned to agents without requiring complex real-time decision-making during the assignment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the assignment problem by introducing cognitive load as a key parameter for matching agents to requests. By changing the assignment criteria from simple availability-based matching to cognitive load-based matching, the system achieves more efficient resolution without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If service agents with higher knowledge and experience are assigned to all requests, then resolution quality improves, but resource utilization efficiency decreases due to overassignment of high-level agents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution qualityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by matching agent capabilities to specific request requirements. Instead of uniformly assigning high-level agents to all requests, the system assigns agents based on the cognitive load characteristics of individual requests, ensuring that each agent receives tasks matching their skill level and that high-level agents are utilized only when necessary for complex requests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by assigning only the minimum necessary agent capability required for each request. By estimating cognitive load, the system avoids overassigning high-level agents to simple requests while ensuring sufficient capability is provided for complex requests, thereby optimizing the utilization of human resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If cognitive load estimation is performed for all service requests, then agent assignment accuracy improves, but processing time increases due to additional calculation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassignment accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the cognitive load estimation into three distinct components: intrinsic cognitive load (complexity of the issue itself), extraneous cognitive load (complexity of information presentation), and germane cognitive load (relevance of available information). This segmentation allows for more accurate and efficient estimation by addressing each component systematically rather than computing a monolithic metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If service requests are escalated when resolution fails, then resolution completeness improves, but time to resolution increases and resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresolution completenessVSAvoidtime to resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides beforehand cushioning by assigning agents with sufficient cognitive load capacity to handle requests from the outset. By estimating cognitive loads and matching them to appropriate agent capabilities, the system reduces the likelihood of resolution failure and subsequent escalation, thereby preventing the time penalty associated with escalation cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS20240211830A1System and method for managing issues based on cognitive loads
Publication Date: 2024.06.27 DELL PROD LP
  • US20240211830A1 patent drawing
  • US20240211830A1 patent drawing
  • US20240211830A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for managing customer-encountered issues are disclosed. To manage the customer-encountered issues, cognitive loads likely to be imposed on service agents for resolving the customer-encountered issues may be estimated. The cognitive load estimates may be used to identify service agents likely to be able to shoulder the cognitive loads for resolving the customer-encountered issues thereby reducing the likelihood of occurrence of resolution attempt failures. Consequently, the average time to resolve customer-encountered issues may be reduced through reduced likelihood of escalation of the customer-encountered issues.