Cognitive System Material Insight Ranking via Alignment Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cognitive computing systems often uncover numerous relationships in a knowledge base but struggle to automatically identify material insights, relying on human analysts to determine significance, and frequently highlight common knowledge rather than new or hidden relationships.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates a 'degree of alignment' for discovered relationships based on evidence, allowing the system to prioritize and present material insights, using metrics such as recentness and alignment with general knowledge, and allowing user-defined criteria to adjust the importance of relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cognitive systems highlight the strongest relationships based on common knowledge, then the system provides reliable and well-known information, but it fails to identify material insights and new or hidden relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of known relationshipsVSAvoidloss of material insights
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation of relationships into multiple independent dimensions: (1) strength of relationship based on corpus evidence, (2) degree of alignment with commonly known relationships, and (3) recency of the relationship. This segmentation allows the system to separately evaluate and combine these factors to identify material insights that would be missed by focusing on a single dimension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a 'degree of alignment' parameter that measures how well a discovered relationship matches commonly known relationships. By changing the evaluation parameter from simply relationship strength to include alignment degree, the system can distinguish between well-known relationships and material insights, resolving the contradiction between reliability and information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the system ranks relationships by strength alone, then the processing is simple and fast, but the system cannot prioritize material insights over common knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprecision of insight identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-computing and storing the degree of alignment for each relationship with commonly known relationships in a dictionary. This pre-computation allows the system to quickly retrieve alignment scores during relationship ranking without performing complex analyses in real-time, maintaining processing speed while improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism - the 'degree of alignment' metric and dictionary - that mediates between the simple relationship strength measurement and the complex task of identifying material insights. This intermediary provides a computationally efficient way to evaluate whether a relationship is merely common knowledge or represents a material insight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If human analysts manually determine significance of relationships, then the system can identify material insights accurately, but the system requires extensive human intervention and reduced automation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of insight identificationVSAvoidextent of automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the cognitive system to automatically evaluate and rank relationships using the degree of alignment metric and recency information. The system serves itself by comparing discovered relationships against the pre-stored dictionary of commonly known relationships, eliminating the need for human analysts to manually determine significance while maintaining high accuracy in identifying material insights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Quantity of substance

If the system evaluates all discovered relationships equally, then the system maintains comprehensive coverage, but the system cannot prioritize new or timely information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of relationshipsVSAvoidtime to identify important relationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the relationship ranking adaptive and time-sensitive. The system dynamically adjusts the importance of relationships based on their recency and degree of alignment, allowing the ranking criteria to change over time. This dynamic approach enables the system to prioritize new or timely information while maintaining comprehensive coverage of all discovered relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10706362B2Significance of relationships discovered in a corpus
Publication Date: 2020.07.07 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10706362B2 patent drawing
  • US10706362B2 patent drawing
  • US10706362B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain relationships representing material insights are identified from among a set of discovered relationships. Cognitive discovery of relationships in a knowledge base, or corpus, are ranked according to one or more metrics indicative of material insights, including recentness and degree of alignment.