Cognitive Procurement Order Concierge

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current procurement processes are inefficient, inaccurate, and not scalable, leading to potential delays and increased costs due to late supplier deliveries, with limited proactive management of exceptions and risks in the order delivery process.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent order concierge system that uses behavior models to predict potential issues affecting orders, automatically troubleshoot problems, and proactively remediate issues through automated communication with stakeholders, leveraging real-time data monitoring and historical analysis to optimize order tracking and fulfillment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional procurement processes are used to track orders, then the process is simple to implement, but the system lacks proactiveness in detecting exceptions and risks, leading to delayed detection when orders are already affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexception detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring procurement data sources and predicting potential exceptions before they affect orders. Behavior models analyze historical and real-time data to forecast delivery delays, quality issues, and other risks in advance, enabling proactive remediation rather than reactive response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intelligent order concierge system acts as an intermediary between traditional procurement processes and advanced analytics. This intermediary layer introduces behavior models and prediction capabilities without completely replacing existing systems, gradually enhancing exception detection while managing complexity through modular integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual monitoring of order milestones is performed, then the system is easy to operate, but it is inefficient and not scalable to handle increasing order volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder tracking efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically monitoring procurement data sources, tracking orders through milestones, and detecting exceptions without human intervention. Behavior models continuously analyze data and generate predictions autonomously, freeing personnel from manual monitoring tasks while scaling efficiently with order volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical monitoring processes are replaced with automated electronic systems that use behavior models and data analytics. This substitution transforms labor-intensive milestone tracking into an automated information processing system that scales without proportional increases in operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If exceptions are detected only at affected milestones, then the detection process is simple, but there is little room and time for effective exception management, causing order delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexception response timeVSAvoidexception prediction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection by predicting exceptions before they manifest at critical milestones. Behavior models analyze trends in procurement data to forecast delivery delays, quality issues, and other risks in advance, providing sufficient lead time for effective exception management and remediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where behavior models monitor procurement data sources, detect anomalies, and trigger alerts before exceptions affect orders. This feedback mechanism provides early warning signals that enable timely intervention, reducing response time while managing detection complexity through automated analytics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If traditional procurement systems are used, then implementation is straightforward, but they lack the capability for continuous sourcing paradigm and optimized procurement concierge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous sourcing capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamics by implementing continuous monitoring and adaptive behavior models that evolve with changing procurement conditions. The concierge system dynamically adjusts its analysis based on real-time data from multiple procurement sources, enabling continuous sourcing capabilities that adapt to emerging risks and opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The intelligent order concierge system provides multi-functionality by combining continuous monitoring, exception prediction, risk assessment, and remediation coordination in a single platform. This universal system handles diverse procurement data sources and order types, enhancing adaptability while managing complexity through integrated architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11507914B2Cognitive procurement
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11507914B2 patent drawing
  • US11507914B2 patent drawing
  • US11507914B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples of cognitive procurement are described. In an example embodiment, procurement-specific data sources associated with at least one of a process, an organization, and an industry relevant for procurement operations are monitored. From the monitored procurement-specific data, an operation behavioral pattern is identified. Subsequently, a behavior model of an order is constructed using the operation behavioral pattern and a pre-existing behavior model library. A procurement interaction indicating a query for processing the order is received from a user. The order is tracked by the cognitive order concierge. Using the behavior model, a potential event relating to the order is predicted, the potential event being indicative of an issue affecting the order. Accordingly, the issue affecting the order is proactively remediated to automatically troubleshoot the order. In an example, the user is notified as per the remediation requirement.