Cognitive Pipeline Supervision for Document Processing Deviations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous machine learning pipelines face challenges in handling variations in input data without escalating decisions to human intervention, requiring a solution that balances processing speed with focused human oversight to achieve operational efficiencies equal to or superior to human operation and create trust in the systems.

Innovation Solution

The cognitive pipeline supervision program identifies key performance indicators, reports deviations to a centralized tracker, and incorporates human responses to escalate and reprocess issues, ensuring document-centric processing with domain expert oversight to manage anomalies and improve data handling efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous machine learning pipelines process data without human intervention, then processing speed and productivity are improved, but reliability and accuracy deteriorate due to inability to handle data variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a supervisor component as an intermediary between the autonomous machine learning pipeline and human operators. This supervisor monitors pipeline executions, identifies deviations from expected behavior, and selectively escalates only problematic cases to human reviewers. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining high-speed autonomous processing for normal cases while ensuring reliability through targeted human oversight for anomalous cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the supervisor component continuously monitors pipeline output against defined performance indicators and data quality standards. When deviations are detected, the system triggers escalations to human operators, who then provide corrections that feed back into the pipeline. This closed-loop feedback system maintains both high productivity through automation and high reliability through continuous quality validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If human operators review all pipeline outputs, then reliability and accuracy are improved, but processing speed and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The supervisor component applies partial human action by selectively escalating only a subset of pipeline outputs that exhibit deviations or anomalies. Instead of requiring human review for all data (excessive action), the system intelligently identifies and routes only problematic cases to human operators. This partial application of human oversight maintains accuracy for critical cases while preserving overall processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system escalates all deviations to human supervisors, then reliability is improved through comprehensive oversight, but processing speed and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoversight coverageVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The supervisor component applies local quality by differentiating between normal and anomalous pipeline executions. Instead of uniform human oversight across all cases, the system applies enhanced scrutiny only locally to specific deviations that meet predefined escalation criteria. This localized approach maintains reliability for problematic cases while avoiding unnecessary bottlenecks for normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the threshold for human intervention based on pipeline performance parameters and deviation severity. By changing the parameter of escalation sensitivity, the system can maintain high reliability when deviations are significant while preserving operational efficiency when variations are minor. This parameter-based approach allows flexible balancing of oversight coverage and processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11651154B2Orchestrated supervision of a cognitive pipeline
Publication Date: 2023.05.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11651154B2 patent drawing
  • US11651154B2 patent drawing
  • US11651154B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer system, and a computer program product for coordinating supervision of at least one document processing pipeline is provided. The present invention may include receiving one or more documents. The present invention may then include parsing the received one or more documents to identify one or more performance indicators associated with the received one or more documents. The present invention may also include processing the parsed one or more documents based on a series of processor nodes. The present invention may further include identifying one or more deviations associated with the identified one or more performance indicators. The present invention may also include transferring the identified one or more deviations to a supervisor component. The present invention may then include generating at least one deviation escalation. The present invention may then further include reprocessing the generated at least one deviation escalation after a human response.