Cognitive Decline Prediction via Quantitative EEG Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting cognitive decline are invasive, costly, lack normative data, and are not effective in determining an individual's potential for future cognitive decline, often relying on subjective assessments and requiring cooperation from patients.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG), quantitative magnetoencephalogram (qMEG), and quantitative event-related potential (qERP) data using discriminant functions, cluster analysis, and logistic regression to predict future cognitive decline, providing objective and accurate predictions without the need for patient cooperation or invasive procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If neurocognitive tests are used to assess cognitive decline, then cognitive function can be evaluated, but the tests have poor test-retest reliability and depend on patient cooperation and examiner experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest-retest reliabilityVSAvoiddependence on patient cooperation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective neurocognitive testing with objective quantitative EEG measurement. Instead of relying on patient cooperation and examiner judgment, the system uses automated digital analysis of brain wave patterns to objectively identify cognitive decline, eliminating the mechanical and subjective limitations of traditional behavioral testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-assessment through automated algorithms that analyze EEG data without requiring active patient participation beyond basic electrode placement. The quantitative analysis automatically performs the assessment function that previously required examiner expertise and patient cooperation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If invasive imaging methods are used to detect brain abnormalities, then diagnostic accuracy can be improved, but the methods are costly and invasive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidinvasiveness and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes invasive imaging techniques (MRI, PET, SPECT) with non-invasive quantitative EEG measurement. The system achieves diagnostic accuracy through digital analysis of electrical brain activity patterns, eliminating the need for invasive procedures and expensive imaging equipment while maintaining or improving detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a functional copy of brain activity patterns through EEG measurement, capturing cognitive state information without physically invading the brain or requiring complex imaging hardware. This functional copying approach provides diagnostic data through electrical signal analysis rather than structural imaging

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If traditional imaging methods are used to predict future cognitive decline, then brain abnormalities can be detected, but the methods lack normative data and cannot reliably predict individual potential for future decline

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidlack of normative data
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary quantitative analysis of EEG patterns to identify early markers of cognitive decline before clinical diagnosis occurs. By establishing normative reference ranges through preliminary study of healthy populations, the system can predict future decline in individuals by comparing their EEG patterns against these established norms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from quantitative EEG analysis to provide individualized predictions about cognitive decline risk. The automated algorithms continuously compare patient EEG data against normative standards and provide actionable feedback about cognitive status and future decline probability, enabling early intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system offers non-invasive, accurate, and objective predictions of cognitive decline, capable of identifying individuals at risk for future cognitive decline without the limitations of existing methods, providing reliable and reproducible results.

Implementation Method 1

An electroencephalogram ('EEG') detects electrical activity of the brain using electrodes placed on or near an individual's scalp and forehead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical activity detection: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

These magnetic fields can be used to detect brain abnormalities based on the measured activity. These magnetic fields are detected using data derived from superconductive quantum interference devices (SQUIDS) to detect spontaneous and or evoked electromagnetic activity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field detection: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP1948014B1System for prediction of cognitive decline
Publication Date: 2017.12.20 NEW YORK UNIV
  • EP1948014B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1948014B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1948014B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for prediction of cognitive decline, comprises an input receiving input data corresponding to brain activity of an individual and a processor coupled to the input for analyzing the input data to obtain a selected set of features, the processor comparing the selected set of features to at least a portion of entries in a database corresponding to brain activity of a plurality of individuals, wherein entries in the database have been separated into a plurality of categories corresponding to one of a degree of cognitive decline and a propensity for future cognitive decline of individuals relating to the entries, the processor determining, based on the comparison, a category most closely corresponding to the selected set of features.