Cognitive Productivity Index for Software Teams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lack of standardized metrics for measuring software development team productivity leads to misaligned investment decisions and unclear organizational factors contributing to high-performing teams, making it difficult to identify and replicate successful team dynamics.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that processes structured and unstructured team data to generate a productivity index, recommending Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for improvement by correlating team profiles with those of most productive teams, using cognitive classification and machine learning algorithms to provide data-driven recommendations for optimizing team output.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standardized metrics are implemented to measure team productivity, then measurement precision and decision alignment improve, but device complexity and implementation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity measurement precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal productivity measurement platform that handles multiple data sources (version control systems, issue trackers, communication tools) and generates comprehensive team performance metrics through a single integrated system, eliminating the need for separate measurement tools for different functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that collects raw data from various development tools, standardizes it through cognitive classification, and transforms it into meaningful productivity metrics. This intermediary layer simplifies the complexity by providing a unified interface between diverse data sources and the measurement system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive team data is collected and analyzed, then productivity insights and recommendations improve, but loss of time and processing resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity insight qualityVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary cognitive classification of team activities and automated tagging of data elements as they are collected, rather than analyzing everything in bulk later. This preliminary organization of data significantly reduces the time required for subsequent analysis and insight generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and focuses only on the most relevant productivity indicators and attributes from the comprehensive team data, rather than processing all available information equally. This selective extraction maintains insight quality while reducing processing time and resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If cognitive classification and machine learning models are deployed, then recommendation accuracy improves, but device complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecommendation accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system is segmented into modular components: data collection modules, cognitive classification modules, model training modules, and recommendation generation modules. Each module handles a specific aspect of the analysis, making the overall complex system manageable and maintainable while preserving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10402193B2Providing customized and targeted performance improvement recommendations for software development teams
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 KYNDRYL INC
  • US10402193B2 patent drawing
  • US10402193B2 patent drawing
  • US10402193B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cognitive system, method and computer program product for maximizing a productivity of software development by a software development team. The system and method implement cognitive processes for determining what certain organizational factors and their optimal values which correspond to high performing software development teams. Based on the determinations correlating organization factors with productivity increases, the system prescribes what Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to improve (e.g., increase and decrease), and determine what are the target improvement values. Use of the systems and methods described herein enable development managers and executives to build maximum performance teams (or transform existing teams, boosting their productivity), by leveraging customized quantitative recommendation provided as output. The system and method overcomes inefficiency of existing measures by enabling global and automated ways of maximizing the development productivity by continuously providing customized and targeted performance improvement.