Cognitive Proximate Recommendation for Return Items

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cognitive models for search and recommendation do not intelligently determine the best alternative when a match does not exist and fail to consider user preferences in weighing feature values to provide better alternatives.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive proximate recommendation method that extracts features and values from user requests, calculates the proximal distance between alternative items, and uses user preferences to rank and return the closest alternatives, enhancing the efficiency of search results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional search techniques rank results based on category data and quality matrix, then search results can be displayed, but the system cannot intelligently determine the best alternative when a match does not exist

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to provide best alternative when match does not existVSAvoidcomplexity of cognitive analysis system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the search problem into distinct components: feature extraction from user requests, feature extraction from alternative items, value comparison, and proximal distance calculation. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex cognitive analysis through modular, manageable steps rather than requiring a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-extracting and storing features and values for alternative items in the database before user queries are processed. When a user request is received, the system compares against pre-processed data, enabling intelligent alternative determination without real-time complex analysis of all item attributes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If conventional techniques do not consider user preferences in weighing feature values, then the system is simpler to operate, but the quality of recommendations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of feature value comparisonVSAvoidease of system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces user preferences as adjustable parameters that weight the importance of different features during comparison. The system allows dynamic adjustment of feature weights based on user preferences, enabling precise measurement of how well alternative items match user needs while maintaining ease of operation through automated parameter application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically applying user preferences to weight feature values during comparison without requiring manual intervention. The cognitive analysis system autonomously determines the proximal distance between alternative items and user requests, providing precise recommendations while keeping the interface simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the system extracts and compares multiple features and values of alternative items, then the quality of search results improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of providing search resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of feature extraction and comparison system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the relevant features and values needed for comparison from alternative items, storing them in a structured format. This extraction approach allows the system to work with essential data elements rather than complete item descriptions, improving productivity while managing computational complexity through selective data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary extraction and organization of features and values for alternative items before they are needed for comparison. This pre-processing enables efficient runtime queries by comparing against pre-structured data, enhancing productivity without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11809433B2Cognitive proximate calculations for a return item
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11809433B2 patent drawing
  • US11809433B2 patent drawing
  • US11809433B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cognitive proximate recommendation method, system, and non-transitory computer readable medium, include first extracting a requested feature and a requested value of the requested feature for a requested item and returning a return item from a plurality of return items stored in the database and returning a ranked list of the plurality of return items, where the ranked list further includes inter-relationships that are defined by defining a primary value of each of the requested items and the return feature corresponding to the requested feature or anchor value for each of the requested items and the return feature corresponding to the requested feature.