Centralized Radio Network Management with Cognitive Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional military ad-hoc wireless networks face challenges in security, reliability, and dynamic management due to node mobility and power constraints, limiting the effectiveness of auto-network and policy-based management techniques, which struggle with maintaining network connectivity and optimizing performance across a limited network view.

Innovation Solution

A centralized radio network management system with an adaptive tuning engine, cognitive learning function, and weighted analysis is employed, utilizing terrain maps and radio node capabilities to create communication reach metrics and optimize radio configurations, thereby proactively managing link disruptions and resource distribution across the network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If auto-network management or policy based network management is used, then each node can manage itself within its limited view, but network-wide optimization and reliability are compromised due to limited visibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous node managementVSAvoidnetwork connectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized network manager is introduced as an intermediary entity that collects information from all nodes, performs network-wide analysis, and coordinates management decisions. This mediator has global visibility of the network state, enabling it to make optimal routing and resource allocation decisions that individual nodes cannot achieve alone, thereby improving reliability while maintaining autonomous node operation through centralized coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If conventional network management is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to dynamic network conditions and link failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanagement system complexityVSAvoidresponse to network dynamics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The network management system implements dynamic adaptation through continuous monitoring of network conditions, real-time analysis of link quality and node mobility, and adaptive adjustment of routing paths and resource allocation. The centralized manager dynamically responds to changing network topologies and traffic patterns, enabling the system to adapt to mobile ad hoc network conditions without requiring complex local decision-making at each node

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If nodes operate autonomously with limited view, then power consumption is reduced, but network-wide resource optimization cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenode power consumptionVSAvoidnetwork resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized network manager acts as an energy-efficient intermediary that performs computationally intensive network-wide analysis and optimization tasks. Individual nodes transmit minimal status information to the manager and receive optimized routing decisions, avoiding the need for each node to perform complex calculations independently. This architecture reduces overall network power consumption while achieving global resource optimization through centralized intelligence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7843822B1Cognitive adaptive network management areas
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US7843822B1 patent drawing
  • US7843822B1 patent drawing
  • US7843822B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A radio network management system, having at least one centralized node is described. The at least one centralized node includes a radio transceiver having more than one adjustable parameter. The centralized node also includes at least one adaptive tuning engine configured to make changes to the at least one adjustable parameter. A weighted analysis function is configured to provide a weighted analysis based on the output of the at least one adaptive tuning engine. Further, a cognitive learning function is configured to provide feedback to make optimally directed adjustments to the at least one adaptive tuning engine.