Cognitive State Aware Activity Completion Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Computing devices lack the ability to dynamically track a user's cognitive and physical states to predict activity completion times and provide personalized performance-boosting recommendations, leading to suboptimal performance in educational and other activities.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that collect data on a user's cognitive and physical states, determine activity type and progress, and use this information to generate a predicted completion timeline and recommend performance-boosting steps, leveraging AI and machine learning techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If computing devices track user cognitive and physical states to predict completion times, then prediction accuracy and personalization improve, but device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of predicting completion time into multiple independent components: cognitive state detection module, physical state detection module, activity type identification module, and completion time prediction module. Each module processes specific data independently and feeds results to the next stage, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high prediction accuracy through specialized processing at each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that collects raw data from multiple sensors and sources, then transforms this data into meaningful features for prediction. This intermediary layer acts as a buffer between complex data collection and the prediction algorithm, simplifying the interface between data acquisition and analysis while enabling accurate predictions through structured data transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system collects and processes multiple data points about user state, then prediction accuracy improves, but loss of time for data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and pre-processing user state data in the background before prediction is needed. Cognitive and physical state indicators are tracked and prepared in advance, so when completion time prediction is required, the system can quickly retrieve pre-processed data rather than collecting and analyzing raw data from scratch, thus maintaining high accuracy without significant time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous monitoring of user cognitive and physical states as a background process that operates throughout the activity duration. This continuous data collection and processing ensures that up-to-date state information is always available for prediction without requiring intermittent batch processing, thereby maintaining prediction accuracy while minimizing time loss through steady-state operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Productivity

If the system provides personalized recommendations based on cognitive state, then user performance improves, but device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser performanceVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing customized recommendations tailored to each user's specific cognitive state and activity context rather than generic advice. The recommendation engine analyzes individual cognitive indicators (such as attention level, mental fatigue) and generates targeted suggestions specific to that user's current state, maximizing performance improvement while keeping the recommendation logic modular and manageable through context-specific processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10921887B2Cognitive state aware accelerated activity completion and amelioration
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 KYNDRYL INC
  • US10921887B2 patent drawing
  • US10921887B2 patent drawing
  • US10921887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for cognitive state aware accelerated activity completion and amelioration are disclosed. A method includes: collecting data related to a cognitive state of a user and a physical state of the user; determining a type of an activity performed by the user and an amount of work for the activity; determining the cognitive state of the user and the physical state of the user based on the data related to the cognitive state of the user and the physical state of the user; determining a predicted completion time for the activity based on the type of the activity, the amount of work for the activity, the cognitive state of the user, and the physical state of the user; and displaying a progress indicator including a portion of the activity that has been completed and an estimated completion time.