Cognitive Test Battery Using Timed-Untimed Score Disparity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard neuropsychological assessments fail to detect subtle cognitive impairments in patients with conditions like mild traumatic brain injury or multiple sclerosis, as they are not sensitive enough, leading to misclassification of these patients as healthy despite significant everyday difficulties.

Innovation Solution

Administer a battery of cognitive tests that include both time-constrained and non-time-constrained tasks, generating composite scores for each, and computing a characteristic value based on these scores to detect subtle cognitive impairment by identifying disparities between the two types of tests.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard neuropsychological assessment tests are used, then the assessment is simple and quick to administer, but the detection sensitivity for subtle cognitive impairment is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidtest battery complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test battery is segmented into multiple categories: timed tests, untimed tests, and tests with varying cognitive demand constraints. This segmentation allows for comprehensive assessment by comparing performance across different test conditions, thereby improving detection sensitivity for subtle cognitive impairment while maintaining manageable test administration through structured categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying cognitive demand constraints across different test administrations. Specifically, the same or similar cognitive tasks are administered under different conditions (with time constraints, without time constraints, with varying stimulus visibility, etc.). This allows detection of subtle impairments by measuring performance differences across parameter variations, thereby improving measurement precision without requiring entirely new test instruments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If time-constrained tests are administered, then additional cognitive demand is imposed to reveal subtle impairment, but test difficulty and patient burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpairment detection accuracyVSAvoidtest administration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively imposing cognitive demand constraints on specific test subsets rather than uniformly across all tests. Timed tests are administered to certain cognitive domains while untimed versions are provided for others, allowing targeted assessment of subtle impairment without unnecessarily burdening the patient across the entire test battery. This localized application of constraints optimizes both detection accuracy and patient ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs partial action by administering time-constrained tests only to the extent necessary for detection. The system evaluates performance on timed tests and compares it with untimed test performance, using this partial imposition of time constraints to reveal subtle impairment. The cognitive demand constraint is applied selectively rather than excessively, achieving detection accuracy while minimizing unnecessary patient burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260013762A1Detection of subtle cognitive impairment
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US20260013762A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013762A1 patent drawing
  • US20260013762A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A means for distinguishing subjects with subtle cognitive impairment in the context of a neuropsychological assessment which comprises a battery of cognitive tests. A first set of tests is administered which have a time-constraint or other cognitive demand parameter imposed. A second set of tests is administered for which the time constraint or other cognitive demand parameter is not imposed. Based on comparing or relating the scores between the two sets of tests, subtle cognitive impairment can be detected, based on a criterion that subjects with subtle cognitive impairment present with a greater disparity in these two sets of scores than do normal subjects.