Cognitive Utility Path Prediction Using Spatial Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for locating buried utilities are often inaccurate and prone to damage, especially when tracer wires are destroyed, making it difficult and expensive to find underground conduits without prior markings, and current systems are limited in versatility and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A cognitive system is trained with historical data from known utility installations to predict the path of underground utilities by applying spatial correlation and cognitive analysis, using geographic and non-geographic features to generate candidate paths with confidence scores, allowing for more accurate and efficient location prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic markers or warning tapes are used to indicate buried utilities, then the presence of utilities can be detected, but the accuracy and reliability of location information deteriorates when markers are damaged, lost, or destroyed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutility location detection reliabilityVSAvoidmarker information loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and analyzing historical utility installation data, geographic features, and environmental information before excavation occurs. This predictive approach establishes utility paths in advance without relying on physical markers that could be damaged or lost, thereby maintaining reliable location information throughout the utility's service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical marker systems (warning tapes, painted symbols, physical markers) with a cognitive computing system that uses spatial correlation and historical data analysis. This substitution eliminates the vulnerability of physical markers to damage while maintaining the ability to indicate utility locations through digital prediction and visualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If ground-penetrating radar or electromagnetic detection methods are used to locate buried utilities, then utility paths can be detected without markers, but the cost and complexity of the detection process increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutility location accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a digital copy or model of utility paths by analyzing historical installation data, geographic features, and spatial relationships. This cognitive model replicates the information that would otherwise require expensive physical detection equipment, providing accurate utility location predictions through data analysis rather than complex electromagnetic scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent develops a universal cognitive system that can predict multiple types of utilities (water, gas, electric, communication) using the same historical data and spatial correlation methodology. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for specialized detection equipment for each utility type, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If manual excavation and visual inspection methods are used to locate utilities, then no specialized equipment is needed, but the time consumption and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidutility location efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing historical utility data, geographic features, and spatial relationships to generate predicted utility paths without requiring manual excavation or visual inspection. The cognitive system independently processes multiple data sources and produces location predictions, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual search methods while maintaining implementation simplicity through software-based solutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If extensive historical data and multiple geographic features are analyzed to improve prediction accuracy, then utility path prediction reliability improves, but the computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveutility path prediction accuracyVSAvoidcognitive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex prediction task into distinct analytical components: spatial correlation of geographic features, temporal analysis of historical installation data, identification of relevant environmental factors, and confidence score calculation. This segmentation allows the cognitive system to process multiple data sources systematically, improving prediction accuracy while managing computational complexity through modular processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11263538B1Predicting paths of underground utilities
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 MINAROVIC JOE T
  • US11263538B1 patent drawing
  • US11263538B1 patent drawing
  • US11263538B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The most likely path for an underground utility having an unknown location is predicted using artificial intelligence. A cognitive system is trained with details associated with historical utility installations whose underground paths are known. The system is applied to whatever installation details are available for the unknown underground utility such as geographic features which are subjected to spatial correlation to derive geographic locations relative to a region of interest for the underground utility. Cognitive analysis is performed on the locations in association with the features to generate candidate paths for the utility. The candidate paths are presented to the user along with computed confidence scores. The installation details may further include nongeographic features used in the cognitive analysis such as a date of installation of the utility or an entity associated with the utility.